Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cole v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 14-911 (2015)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 14-911 Visitors: 2
Judges: Denise Kathryn Vowell
Filed: Apr. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-911V Filed: April 2, 2015 Unpublished ********************************* JANETTE COLE, * * Petitioner, * v. * * Attorney Fees and Costs; Stipulation SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * ********************************* Paul R. Brazil, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA for petitioner. Alexis Babcock, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY F
More
        In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                              OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                              No. 14-911V
                                          Filed: April 2, 2015
                                             Unpublished
*********************************
JANETTE COLE,                                      *
                                                   *
                         Petitioner,               *
                 v.                                *
                                                   *       Attorney Fees and Costs; Stipulation
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                            *
HUMAN SERVICES,                                    *
                                                   *
                         Respondent.               *
                                 *
*********************************
Paul R. Brazil, Esq., Muller Brazil, LLP, Philadelphia, PA for petitioner.
Alexis Babcock, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

                        DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

      On September 26, 2014, Janette Cole filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,2 [the
“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. On March 23, 2015, I issued a decision awarding
compensation to petitioner based on respondent’s proffer to which petitioner agreed.

       On April 2, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Regarding Final
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties agree upon an
award of $14,750.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In accordance with General Order
#9, petitioner’s counsel represents that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend
to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44
U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners have 14 days to identify
and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will
redact such material from public access.


2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2006).
      The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42
U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). I find the proposed amount to be reasonable.

      Accordingly, I award the total $14,750.003 as a lump sum in the form of a
check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel Paul Brazil.

        The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                 s/Denise K. Vowell
                                                 Denise K. Vowell
                                                 Chief Special Master




3
 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including
costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS, 
924 F.2d 1029
(Fed. Cir.1991).

4Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
See Vaccine Rule 11(a).


                                                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer