LAURA D. MILLMAN, Special Master.
On October 2, 2014, petitioners herein sued on behalf of their son J.O. by filing a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10-34 (2006), alleging that hepatitis A and meningococcal ("Menactra") vaccines caused J.O.'s Crohn's disease, or, in the alternative, significantly aggravated his preexisting Crohn's disease.
Under the Vaccine Act, "significant aggravation" is defined as "any change for the worse in a preexisting condition which results in markedly greater disability, pain, or illness accompanied by substantial deterioration of health." 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-33(4).
Crohn's disease is defined as "one of the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease, a chronic granulomatous disease of the gastrointestinal tract of unknown etiology; it can involve any part of the tract, but most often is found in the terminal ileum. Characteristics include scarring and thickening of the bowel wall that frequently leads to intestinal obstruction, abscesses, and fistula formation. There is a high rate of recurrence after treatment."
"[C]hronic diarrhea is the most common presenting complaint[,] and abdominal pain and weight loss are present in over 60% of [Crohn's disease] patients at diagnosis."
On October 31, 2014, the undersigned issued a lengthy Order, describing the contents of the medical records as well as the issues in the case. The undersigned discussed the October 31, 2014 Order with counsel on November 5, 2014, during the first telephonic status conference.
On December 11, 2014, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report, stating that compensation is not appropriate in this case because J.O.'s Crohn's disease began before his hepatitis A and Menactra vaccinations, and petitioners had not filed a medical expert report supporting the allegation that his vaccinations significantly aggravated his pre-existing Crohn's disease.
On December 17, 2014, the undersigned held another telephonic status conference with counsel. Petitioners' counsel stated he was looking for a medical expert, and he had shared both the undersigned's October 31, 2014 Order and respondent's Rule 4(c) Report with petitioners.
On February 19, 2015, the undersigned held another telephonic status conference with counsel. Petitioners' counsel orally moved to dismiss this case.
The undersigned
J.O. was born on November 9, 1999.
On February 22, 2013, J.O. visited his personal care physician ("PCP"), Dr. Anthony Marinello, at Capital Care Family Practice. Med. recs. Ex. 4, at 22-23. Dr. Marinello noted his concern about whether J.O. had food allergies to milk and gluten, based on J.O.'s previous complaints that he had adverse experiences when he drank milk and/or ate anything with gluten, such as wheat.
This visit to Dr. Marinello occurred two days before J.O. visited his grandfather on February 24, 2013, for his grandfather's birthday. At the grandfather's birthday celebration, J.O.'s mother had an upset stomach, vomiting, and diarrhea. Ex. 6, at 2. Within a few days, J.O. had the gastroenteritis his mother had.
Eleven days after his grandfather's birthday, on March 7, 2013, and approximately one week after J.O. caught his mother's gastroenteritis, J.O. saw an allergist, Dr. Ari Kounavis, and gave a history that he had had diarrhea associated with meals for the prior three months. Med. recs. Ex. 2, at 4. The diarrhea occurred one hour after breakfast, after school, and after dinner.
On March 28, 2013, three weeks after J.O. saw the allergist Dr. Kounavis, J.O. saw Dr. Nikki Allmendinger, a pediatric gastroenterologist, at Albany Medical Center. Med. recs. Ex. 1A, at 18. J.O. gave a similar history to Dr. Allmendinger that he had given to Dr. Kounavis, but with additional information.
J.O. told Dr. Allmendinger that for at least the last three months, he had been having daily diarrhea of a small amount, and he only had a formed stool once a week or so.
On April 8, 2013, Dr. Allmendinger performed a colonoscopy on J.O. and diagnosed him with disorder of the intestine, ulceration of the intestine, diarrhea, and blood in his stool. Med. recs. Ex. 1B, at 1. On April 16, 2013, Dr. Allmendinger diagnosed J.O. with Crohn's disease. Med. recs. Ex. 1A, at 16.
On April 19, 2013, Dr. Marinello referred J.O. to an ear-nose-throat ("ENT") specialist because he had an inflamed epiglottis. Med. recs. Ex. 4, at 2.
On April 29, 2013, J.O. saw Dr. Michael De Vito, an ENT, who diagnosed J.O. with allergic rhinitis.
On November 11, 2013, J.O.'s mother requested Dr. Allmendinger write a letter, as she felt there might be a connection between J.O.'s Crohn's disease and the MMRV vaccine that J.O. received on February 22, 2013, because his symptoms developed about a week after it. Med. recs. Ex. 1A, at 11.
J.O. did not receive MMR and varicella vaccines on February 22, 2013. He received hepatitis A vaccine and Menactra on that date. Med. recs. Ex. 4, at 4. MMR and varicella vaccines are attenuated live viral vaccines.
To satisfy their burden of proving causation in fact, petitioners must prove by preponderant evidence: "(1) a medical theory causally connecting the vaccination and the injury; (2) a logical sequence of cause and effect showing that the vaccination was the reason for the injury; and (3) a showing of a proximate temporal relationship between vaccination and injury."
418 F.3d at 1278.
Without more, "evidence showing an absence of other causes does not meet petitioners' affirmative duty to show actual or legal causation."
Petitioners must show not only that but for hepatitis A and Menactra vaccinations, J.O. would not have Crohn's disease or significant aggravation of his Crohn's disease, but also that the vaccines were a substantial factor in causing or significantly aggravating his Crohn's disease.
The Vaccine Act does not permit the undersigned to rule for petitioners based on their claims alone, "unsubstantiated by medical records or by medical opinion." 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-13(a)(1). In this case, J.O.'s medical records do not substantiate petitioners' claims. Moreover, petitioners have not filed an expert medical opinion substantiating their claims.
The undersigned
This petition is