NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On March 19, 2015, petitioner, Rita Glynn, filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,
On June 1, 2015, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ["SIRVA"]. On November 20, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ["Proffer"] indicating petitioner should be awarded $75,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer,
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.
On March 19, 2015, Rita Glynn ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation ("Petition") under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 ("Vaccine Act" or "Act"), as amended. The Petition alleges that petitioner received a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis ("Tdap") vaccine in her left shoulder on April 30, 2012, and subsequently suffered brachial neuritis, impingement syndrome, and frozen shoulder, as a result of the vaccination. Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report, filed on June 1, 2015, conceded that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case because her alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA"), no other cause for her condition has been identified, and she has suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. In light of respondent's concession, on June 21, 2015, the Chief Special Master found petitioner entitled to compensation.
Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $75,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $75,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.