Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Taylor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 15-0865V. (2015)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20160503c72 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On August 12, 2015, Georgette Taylor ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act" or "Program"). Petitioner alleged that the influenza ("flu") vaccination that she received on September 23, 2014, caused her to suffer a shoulder injury. On November 10, 2015, a decision was issued awarding compensati
More

DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS1

On August 12, 2015, Georgette Taylor ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act" or "Program"). Petitioner alleged that the influenza ("flu") vaccination that she received on September 23, 2014, caused her to suffer a shoulder injury. On November 10, 2015, a decision was issued awarding compensation to petitioner based on a proffer from respondent.

On December 16, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Concerning Attorneys' Fees and Costs. According to the stipulation, the parties stipulate to an award of $10,714.90 for attorney's fees and costs. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner filed a statement indicating that she incurred no out-of-pocket expenses related to the litigation of this case.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). The proposed amount is reasonable.

Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $10,714.903 as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner's counsel Amber D. Wilson.

The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, "advanced costs" as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec'y, HHS, 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).
4. Entry of judgment can be expedited by the filing of a joint notice renouncing the right to seek review. See Vaccine Rule 11(a).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer