NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On April 7, 2015, Arika Browne filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,
On August 20, 2015, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration ("SIRVA"). On October 5, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ["Proffer"] indicating petitioner should be awarded $37,000.00 for lost earnings, $85,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering, and $4,000.00 for past unreimbursable expenses, amounting to a total award of $126,000.00. Proffer at 1-2. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer,
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.
Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner is not entitled to an award for projected unreimbursable medical care expenses incurred from the date of judgment as provided under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner agrees.
The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Arika Browne has suffered a past loss of earnings as a result of her vaccine-related injury. Therefore, respondent proffers that the Court should award Arika Browne a lump sum of $37,000.00 for her lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
Respondent proffers that the Court should award Arika Browne a lump sum of $85,000.00 for her actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value.
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents Arika Browne's expenditure of past unreimubursable expenses as a result of her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that the Court should award Arika Browne a lump sum of $4,000.00 for past unreimbursable expenses as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner agrees.
Petitioner represents that there are no outstanding Medicaid liens related to her vaccine-related injury.
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following
Lump sum payable to petitioner: