Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ragia v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 15-312V. (2015)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20160926a57 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On March 26, 2015, Jovan Ragia ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 [the "Vaccine Act"]. Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury caused by the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis ("Tdap") vaccine he received on April 16, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processin
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On March 26, 2015, Jovan Ragia ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the "Vaccine Act"]. Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury caused by the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis ("Tdap") vaccine he received on April 16, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 30, 2015, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement in favor of petitioner. On October 14, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ["Proffer"] stating that petitioner should be awarded a lump sum in the amount of $109,579.18. Proffer at 2. This amount represents compensation for lost earnings ($8,326.22), pain and suffering ($100,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($1,252.96).

Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as set forth in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards the following:

A. A lump sum payment of $109,579.18, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Jovan Ragia. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). Proffer ¶III.

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

A. Future Medical Care Expenses

Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner is not entitled to an award for projected unreimbursable medical care expenses incurred from the date of judgment as provided under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner agrees.

B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Jovan Ragia has suffered a past loss of earnings as a result of his vaccine-related injury. Therefore, respondent proffers that the Court should award Jovan Ragia a lump sum of $8,326.22 for his lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that the Court should award Jovan Ragia a lump sum of $100,000.00 for his actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents Jovan Ragia's expenditure of past unreimubursable expenses as a result of his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that the Court should award Jovan Ragia a lump sum of $1,252.96 for past unreimbursable expenses as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner agrees.

E. Medicaid Lien

Petitioner represents that there are no outstanding Medicaid liens related to his vaccine-related injury.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $109,579.18, representing compensation for lost earnings ($8,326.22), pain and suffering ($100,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($1,252.96), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Jovan Ragia.

III. Summary of Recommended Payment Following Judgment

Lump sum payable to petitioner: $109,579.18

Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General RUPA BHATTACHARYYA Director Torts Branch, Civil Division VINCENT J. MATANOSKI Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division LINDA S. RENZI Senior Trial Counsel Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Claudia B. Gangi CLAUDIA B. GANGI Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-4138 Dated: October 14, 2015

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and suffering.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer