Judges: Susan G. Braden
Filed: Apr. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-291 C Filed: April 11, 2016 ************************************* * JAY HYMAS, * d/b/a DOSMEN FARMS, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * ************************************* ORDER Pursuant to the April 6, 2016 mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the permanent injunction is dissolved. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-291 C Filed: April 11, 2016 ************************************* * JAY HYMAS, * d/b/a DOSMEN FARMS, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * ************************************* ORDER Pursuant to the April 6, 2016 mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the permanent injunction is dissolved. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington,..
More
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. 13-291 C
Filed: April 11, 2016
*************************************
*
JAY HYMAS, *
d/b/a DOSMEN FARMS, *
*
Plaintiff, *
*
v. *
*
THE UNITED STATES, *
*
Defendant. *
*
*************************************
ORDER
Pursuant to the April 6, 2016 mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, the permanent injunction is dissolved. This case is transferred to the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Washington, as requested by Plaintiff’s April 7, 2016 Motion
to Transfer (ECF No. 54). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, this is a “disposition consistent with the
[mandate].” See Hymas v. United States,
810 F.3d 1312, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2016); see also
id. at
1330 n.10 (“Because the Claims Court does not possess jurisdiction . . . we need not address its
findings that the Service violated various federal procurement laws and the APA [Administrative
Procedures Act.]”).
Accordingly, the Government’s April 7, 2016 Motion for Reconsideration and Motion to
Dismiss (ECF No. 56) is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court will transfer the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Susan G. Braden
SUSAN G. BRADEN
Judge