In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                               OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 14-154V
                                    Filed: October 25, 2016

*************************
LYDIA MCSHERRY by her parents, GENE *
MCSHERRY and KARI MCSHERRY,         *
as Legal Guardians,                 *                         UNPUBLISHED
                                    *
                                    *                         Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman
                    Petitioners,    *
                                    *
v.                                  *                         Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
                                    *                         Reasonable Amount Requested
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                 *                         to which Respondent Does Not
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                 *                         Object.
                                    *
                    Respondent.     *
*************************

Mark L. Krueger, Krueger & Hernandez, S.C., Baraboo, WI, for Petitioners.
Debra A. Filteau Begley, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                                            DECISION1

       On February 27, 2014, Gene McSherry and Kari McSherry (“Petitioners”) petitioned for
compensation on behalf of Lydia McSherry under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of
1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012). Petitioners alleged that the administration of human
papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccines on March 28, 2007, June 13, 2007, and September 10, 2008
caused her to develop premature ovarian failure. Petition at Preamble, filed Feb. 27, 2014. On

1
 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the purposes espoused in the E-Government Act of 2002. See 44
U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). Each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
May 9, 2016, a decision dismissing this case was issued, as the claim was time-barred by the
Act’s statute of limitations.

         On October 13, 2016, Petitioner filed an application for attorneys’ fees and costs.
Petitioner requested compensation in the amount of $13,386.41 for attorneys’ fees and costs, of
which none were personally incurred by Petitioner. Petitioner’s Application at 4, filed Oct. 13,
2016. “Respondent does not object to the overall amount sought, as it is not an unreasonable
amount to have been incurred for proceedings in this case to date.” Response at 1, filed Oct. 25,
2016. Respondent noted that her lack of objection should not be construed as an admission,
concession, or waiver as to the hourly rates requested, the number of hours billed, or the other
litigation related costs. 

with the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e) (2012), the undersigned
finds that Petitioner’s request for fees and costs is reasonable. Accordingly, the undersigned
hereby awards the amount of $13,386.41, in the form of a check made payable jointly to
Petitioners and Petitioners’ counsel, Mark L. Krueger, of Krueger & Hernandez, S.C. In
the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court
shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.2

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                             /s/Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman
                                             Lisa D. Hamilton-Fieldman
                                             Special Master




2
 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to
seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a).