Filed: Jan. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES F. MEROW , Senior District Judge . The instant bid protest was filed on January 21, 2016. See Doc. 1. On January 27, 2016, Matt Martin Real Estate Management, LLC, filed a motion to intervene. See Doc. 5. It has come to the court's attention that the intervenor is represented by attorneys with the firm Venable, LLC. As such, I must disqualify myself as the presiding judge, and the case will be reassigned to another judge on the court. The statute governing judicial disqual
Summary: ORDER JAMES F. MEROW , Senior District Judge . The instant bid protest was filed on January 21, 2016. See Doc. 1. On January 27, 2016, Matt Martin Real Estate Management, LLC, filed a motion to intervene. See Doc. 5. It has come to the court's attention that the intervenor is represented by attorneys with the firm Venable, LLC. As such, I must disqualify myself as the presiding judge, and the case will be reassigned to another judge on the court. The statute governing judicial disquali..
More
ORDER
JAMES F. MEROW, Senior District Judge.
The instant bid protest was filed on January 21, 2016. See Doc. 1. On January 27, 2016, Matt Martin Real Estate Management, LLC, filed a motion to intervene. See Doc. 5. It has come to the court's attention that the intervenor is represented by attorneys with the firm Venable, LLC. As such, I must disqualify myself as the presiding judge, and the case will be reassigned to another judge on the court.
The statute governing judicial disqualification provides, in relevant part, that a judge "shall" disqualify himself if "[h]e or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person . . . [i]s known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding." 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(5)(iii). A "person within the third degree of relationship" to me is a partner at Venable. As a partner with the firm, he has an interest that "could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding." See, e.g., Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1113 (5th Cir. 1980).
Because the statute specifies that the parties cannot waive disqualification under these circumstances, I must recuse myself. See 28 U.S.C. 455(e). The clerk of court is directed to reassign this case.
SO ORDERED.
