HADDAD v. U.S., 15-1075C. (2016)
Court: United States Court of Federal Claims
Number: infdco20160208686
Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER VICTOR J. WOLSKI , District Judge . On January 27, 2016, the Clerk's office received a document from Mr. Haddad, which was not filed when received because it did not appear to be of a type recognizable for filing under our rules. The document discusses Mr. Haddad's participation in GED courses and the request of prison officials that he provide personal information on forms. It does not appear to have anything to do with Mr. Haddad's complaint or the government's motion to dismiss th
Summary: ORDER VICTOR J. WOLSKI , District Judge . On January 27, 2016, the Clerk's office received a document from Mr. Haddad, which was not filed when received because it did not appear to be of a type recognizable for filing under our rules. The document discusses Mr. Haddad's participation in GED courses and the request of prison officials that he provide personal information on forms. It does not appear to have anything to do with Mr. Haddad's complaint or the government's motion to dismiss the..
More
ORDER
VICTOR J. WOLSKI, District Judge.
On January 27, 2016, the Clerk's office received a document from Mr. Haddad, which was not filed when received because it did not appear to be of a type recognizable for filing under our rules. The document discusses Mr. Haddad's participation in GED courses and the request of prison officials that he provide personal information on forms. It does not appear to have anything to do with Mr. Haddad's complaint or the government's motion to dismiss the above-captioned case. Taking plaintiffs prose status into consideration, however, the Court will allow the document to be filed as a status report. The Clerk is directed to file the document as such.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
