Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KUZMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 14-726V. (2016)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20160525b27 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 LAURA D. MILLMAN , Special Master . On May 3, 2016, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that his daughter, I.K., suffered from intussusception as a result of her receipt of rotavirus vaccine on November 25, 2013. Respondent denies that the rotavirus vaccine caused I.K. to suffer intussusception or any other injury and further denies that the rotavirus vaccine
More

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On May 3, 2016, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that his daughter, I.K., suffered from intussusception as a result of her receipt of rotavirus vaccine on November 25, 2013. Respondent denies that the rotavirus vaccine caused I.K. to suffer intussusception or any other injury and further denies that the rotavirus vaccine caused I.K.'s current condition. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.

The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby adopts the parties' said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of $13,250.00, representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) (2012). The award shall be in the form of a check for $13,250.00 made payable to petitioner as Legal Representative of a Minor Child, I.K.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. On behalf of his daughter, LK, Trent Ktiman, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to I.K.'s receipt of a rotavirus vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. I.K. received a rotavirus vaccine on November 25, 2013.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that I.K. suffered from intussusception as a result of receiving the rotavirus vaccine.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on LK.'s behalf as a result of her condition.

6. Respondent denies that the vaccine caused I.K. to suffer intussusception or any other injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $13,250.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, as Legal Representative of a Minor Child, LK. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services en a pre-paid basis.

11. The payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys' fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursable expenses, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of I.K. as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g) and (h).

13. Petitioner represents that he presently is, or within 90 days of the date of judgment will become, duly authorized to serve as guardian/conservator of I.K.'s estate under the laws of the State of California. No payment pursuant to this Stipulation shall be made until petitioner provides the Secretary with documentation establishing his appointment as guardian/conservator of I.K.'s estate. If petitioner is not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian/conservator of the estate of I.K. at the time a payment pursuant to this Stipulation is to be made, any such payment shall be paid to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardians/conservators of the estate of I.K. upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary.

14. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 9, petitioner, in his individual capacity and as legal representative of I.K., on behalf of himself, I.K., and her heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, do forever irrevocably and unconditionally release, acquit and discharge the United States and the Secretary of Health and Human Services from any and all actions or causes of action (including agreements, judgments, claims, damages, loss of services, expenses and all demands of whatever kind or nature) that have been brought, could have been brought, or could be timely brought in the Court of Federal Claims, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq., on account of, or in any way growing out of, any and all known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected personal injuries to or death of I.K. resulting from, or alleged to have resulted from, the rotavirus vaccination administered on November 25, 2013, as alleged by petitioner in a petition for vaccine compensation filed on or about August 11, 2014 in the United States Court of Federal Claims as petition No. 14-726V.

15. If I.K. should die prior to entry of judgment, this agreement shall be voidable upon proper notice to the Court on behalf of either or both of the parties.

16. If the special master fails to issue a decision in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation or if the Court of Federal Claims fails to enter judgment in conformity with a decision that is in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation, then the parties' settlement and this Stipulation shall be voidable at the sole discretion of either party.

17. This Stipulation expresses a full and complete negotiated settlement of liability and damages claimed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, except as otherwise noted in paragraph 9 above. There is absolutely no agreement on the part of the parties hereto to make any payment or to do any act or thing other than is herein expressly stated and clearly agreed to. The parties further agree and understand that the award described in this Stipulation may reflect a compromise of the parties' respective positions as to liability and/or amount of damages, and further, that a change in the nature of the injury or condition or in the items of compensation sought, is not grounds to modify or revise this agreement.

18. This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission by the United States or the Secretary of Health and Human Services that I.K. suffered intussusception as a result of receiving the rotavirus vaccine, or any other vaccine, or that her current disabilities are sequelae of her alleged vaccine-related injuries.

19. MI rights and obligations of petitioners hereunder shall apply equally to petitioner's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns as legal representatives of I.K.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master's action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document=s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access.
2. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer