Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bailey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 15-574 (2017)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 15-574 Visitors: 2
Judges: George L. Hastings
Filed: Apr. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-574V (Not to be published) ************************* * WARREN K. BAILEY, * * Petitioner, * Filed: March 23, 2017 * v. * Decision by Proffer; Vaccine Act * Entitlement; Damages; Influenza SECRETARY OF HEALH * Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to HUMAN SERVICES * Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. * * ************************* Paul S. Dannenberg, Huntington, Vermont, for Petitioner Ilene Albala, U.S. Department of
More
                 In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                     OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                              No. 15-574V
                                          (Not to be published)


*************************
                           *
WARREN K. BAILEY,          *
                           *
               Petitioner, *                                              Filed: March 23, 2017
                           *
          v.               *                                              Decision by Proffer; Vaccine Act
                           *                                              Entitlement; Damages; Influenza
SECRETARY OF HEALH         *                                              Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to
HUMAN SERVICES             *                                              Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)
               Respondent. *
                           *
*************************

Paul S. Dannenberg, Huntington, Vermont, for Petitioner
Ilene Albala, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.


                                                    DECISION1

HASTINGS, Special Master.

      This is an action seeking an award under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program2 on account of an injury suffered by Warren K. Bailey. On February 16, 2017,
Respondent filed a report conceding that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case.

        After discussions between the parties, on March 21, 2017, Respondent filed a “Proffer on
Award of Compensation.” Petitioner’s counsel, Paul Dannenberg, contacted a member of my
staff by e-mail, on March 22, 2017, to indicate that Petitioner accepts Respondent’s Proffer as a
reasonable measure of the amount of the award in this case.


1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this
Decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. Therefore, this document will be made available to
the public unless the Petitioner files, within fourteen days, an objection to the disclosure of any material in the
Decision that would constitute, “medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy.” See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—12(d)(4)(B); Vaccine Rule 18(b).
2
  The applicable statutory provisions defining the Program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 et seq. (2012).
Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references will be to 42 U.S.C. (2012). I will also sometimes refer to the Act
of Congress that created the Program as the “Vaccine Act.”
        I have reviewed the file, and based on that review, I conclude that the Respondent’s
Proffer appears to be an appropriate one, pursuant to § 300aa-15(b). (I have attached a copy of
the Proffer to this decision.) I order that Respondent make a lump sum payment as described
below.

        •        Respondent shall make a total lump sum payment of $125,000.00, in the form of a
                 check payable to Petitioner, representing compensation for all damages that
                 would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

        Under the statute governing the Program, as well as the “Vaccine Rules” adopted by this
court, the special master must now enter a decision endorsing that Proffer, and the clerk must
enter judgment, in order to authorize payment of the award. See § 300aa-12(d)(3)(A) and (e)(3);
§ 300aa-13(a); Vaccine Rules 10(a), 11(a).3

        Warren K. Bailey is entitled to an award under the Vaccine Act to provide compensation
for her injury. The award shall be in the form of a lump sum payment, as provided above.

      In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review of this Decision, the clerk shall enter
judgment in accord with this Decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


                                                                 /s/ George L. Hastings, Jr.
                                                                     George L. Hastings, Jr.
                                                                     Special Master




3
 The “Vaccine Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims” are found in Appendix B of the Rules of the
United States Court of Federal Claims.
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                          OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS


WARREN K. BAILEY,

                       Petitioner,

v.                                                     No. 15-574V
                                                       Special Master George Hastings
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                ECF
HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.


             RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

       On February 16, 2017, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report in which she conceded

entitlement. Respondent now proffers that petitioner receive an award of a lump sum of

$125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation

for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner is entitled. 1

This proffer does not address final attorneys’ fees and litigation costs. Petitioner is additionally

entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, to be determined at a later date upon

petitioner submitting substantiating documentation.

       Petitioner agrees with the proffered award of $125,000.00 as representing all elements of

compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner is entitled.

                                               Respectfully submitted,

                                               CHAD A. READLER
                                               Acting Assistant Attorney General



1
       Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move
the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.


                                                  1
                        C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
                        Acting Director
                        Torts Branch, Civil Division

                        CATHARINE E. REEVES
                        Deputy Director
                        Torts Branch, Civil Division

                        ALTHEA WALKER DAVIS
                        Senior Trial Counsel
                        Torts Branch, Civil Division

                        s/Camille M. Collett
                        CAMILLE M. COLLETT
                        Trial Attorney
                        Torts Branch, Civil Division
                        U.S. Department of Justice
                        P.O. Box 146
                        Benjamin Franklin Station
                        Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
                        Telephone: (202) 616-4098

Dated: March 21, 2017




                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer