Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Frye v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 16-966 (2017)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 16-966 Visitors: 10
Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey
Filed: Dec. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-966V Filed: March 31, 2017 UNPUBLISHED **************************** TAMARA FRYE, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; v. * Influenza (“Flu”); Shoulder Injury * Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) * Respondent. * * **************************** Franklin Caldwell, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, FL, for petitioner. Camille Co
More
        In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 16-966V
                                     Filed: March 31, 2017
                                         UNPUBLISHED

****************************
TAMARA FRYE,                             *
                                         *
                     Petitioner,         *      Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
v.                                       *      Influenza (“Flu”); Shoulder Injury
                                         *      Related to Vaccine Administration
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                      *      (“SIRVA”);
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                      *      Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
                                         *
                     Respondent.         *
                                         *
****************************
Franklin Caldwell, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, FL, for petitioner.
Camille Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                               DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

       On August 9, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that she received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine in her left arm on
November 25, 2015 and thereafter suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special
Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

        On December 7, 2016, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner
entitled to compensation for a SIRVA. On March 31, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on
award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $101,686.29.
Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the
proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner
is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
petitioner a lump sum payment of $101,686.29 in the form of a check payable to
petitioner, Tamara Frye. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

       The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                          s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                          Nora Beth Dorsey
                                          Chief Special Master




3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.


                                                      2
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                          OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS


TAMARA FRYE,

                        Petitioner,

v.                                                      No. 16-966V
                                                        Chief Special Master Nora Beth Dorsey
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                 ECF
HUMAN SERVICES,

                        Respondent.



             RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

        On December 6, 2016, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding

petitioner entitled to compensation. Respondent now proffers that petitioner receive an award of

a lump sum of $101,686.29 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents

compensation for all elements of compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which

petitioner is entitled. 1 This proffer does not address final attorneys’ fees and litigation costs.

Petitioner is additionally entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, to be

determined at a later date upon petitioner submitting substantiating documentation.

        Petitioner agrees with the proffered award of $101,686.29 as representing all elements of

compensation under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) to which petitioner is entitled.

                                                Respectfully submitted,

                                                CHAD A. READLER
                                                Acting Assistant Attorney General


1
       Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move
the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future
medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
                        C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
                        Acting Director
                        Torts Branch, Civil Division

                        CATHARINE E. REEVES
                        Deputy Director
                        Torts Branch, Civil Division

                        MICHAEL P. MILMOE
                        Senior Trial Counsel
                        Torts Branch, Civil Division

                        s/Camille M. Collett
                        CAMILLE M. COLLETT
                        Trial Attorney
                        Torts Branch, Civil Division
                        U.S. Department of Justice
                        P.O. Box 146
                        Benjamin Franklin Station
                        Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
                        Telephone: (202) 616-4098

Dated: March 31, 2017




                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer