BRIAN H. CORCORAN, Special Master.
On May 12, 2015, Rosa Allicock filed a petition on behalf of her minor child, M.A., seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ("Vaccine Program").
On March 15, 2016, Petitioner filed a motion requesting attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $19,881.35. ECF No. 24. Respondent opposed the request on March 30, 2016, arguing that the claim lacked reasonable basis, and that Petitioner's counsel had reasonable time to discover that prior to filing the case. Petitioner thereafter filed a reply in response to Respondent's objections and requested an additional fee, bringing the total request for attorney's fees and costs to $24,029.43. ECF No. 26-27. I determined that, due to the pending statute of limitations when counsel received the case, the claim had reasonable basis until the date Petitioner requested dismissal. However, I also noted that some of the hours that counsel spent on the case were not reasonable. Therefore, I issued a decision granting in part Petitioner's request for attorney's fees and costs, and awarded $20,411.28. ECF No. 28.
Respondent filed a motion for review of my decision on June 22, 2016. ECF No. 29. Judge Thomas C. Wheeler of the United States Court of Federal Claims denied the motion for review and affirmed my decision to award attorney's fees and costs on October 25, 2016. ECF No. 35. Respondent then filed an appeal of that decision with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on December 27, 2016 (ECF No. 39); however, both parties agreed to dismiss the appeal on January 26, 2017. ECF No. 40.
Petitioner has now filed a motion requesting final attorney's fees and costs related solely to the appeal, dated January 31, 2017. See ECF No. 41. Petitioner requests reimbursement of attorney's fees and costs in the combined amount of $4,866.56 (representing $4,583.00 in attorney's fees, plus $283.56 in costs). Id. at 1. In addition, and in compliance with General Order No. 9, Petitioner represents that she incurred no litigation-related expenses in conjunction with this proceeding. Id.
Respondent filed a brief in reaction the same day. ECF No. 42. Respondent asserts that "[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13 contemplates any role for Respondent in the resolution of a request by a Petitioner for an award of attorney's fees and costs." Id. at 1. Respondent added, however, that (as previously argued) Respondent still contends there was no reasonable basis for filing the petition in this matter and therefore does not believe the statutory requirements for an attorney's fees and costs award are met. Id. at 2. Respondent admitted that the Court of Federal Claims decided this issue against Respondent, and therefore Respondent requested that I utilize my discretion in determining a reasonable award for Petitioner's appeal-related attorney's fees and costs. Id. at 2-3.
Because I found that Petitioner's underlying claim lacked reasonable basis after a certain point in time, I denied all fees incurred in this matter after that date. In other circumstances, I would similarly decline to award appeal-related fees for a case lacking reasonable basis (especially after that determination had been upheld, as here). However, in this case, the costs incurred by Petitioner on appeal were a function of Respondent's actions, not Petitioner's, and should thus be reimbursed. In addition, the hourly rate sought by Petitioner's counsel for that work is consistent with what I have awarded him in the past, see Al-Uffi v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 13-956V, 2015 WL 6181669 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 30, 2015), and the total hours worked also appear reasonable.
I therefore approve Petitioner's requested amount for appeal-related attorney's fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly, an award of $4,866.56 should be made in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner's counsel, Andrew D. Downing, Esq. Payment of this amount represents all attorney's fees and costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the Court