NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On December 3, 2015, petitioner, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Tuttle ("Charles"), filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,
On April 25, 2017, petitioner filed an amended unopposed application for attorneys' fees and costs. (ECF No. 31).
The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request. In the undersigned's experience, the request appears reasonable, and the undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or costs. However, the undersigned reduces the award to reflect a rate reduction for travel time. Ms. Williams billed 3.5 hours for travel time on December 2, 2015, amounting to a billing of $875.00. (ECF No. 31-2 at 2).
Other than the deduction noted above, in the undersigned's experience, the request appears reasonable, and the undersigned finds no cause to further reduce the requested hours or rates.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner's request and the lack of opposition from respondent, the undersigned
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.
The undersigned notes that grouping multiple activities into single time entries is frowned upon and makes a line-by-line analysis nearly impossible. See, e.g. Riggins v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 99-38V, 2009 WL 3319818, *23-24 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 15, 2009). Attorneys are advised that "[e]ach task should have its own line entry indicating the amount of time spent on that task" and that "[l]umping together several unrelated tasks in the same time entry frustrates the court's ability to assess the reasonableness of the request." Guidelines for Practice Under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program at 68 (available on the court's website at http://www.cofc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/GUIDELINES-FOR-PRACTICE-4212016.pdf).