BOOTH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 17-246V. (2017)
Court: United States Court of Federal Claims
Number: infdco20180130d16
Filed: Aug. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2017
Summary: RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On February 21, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration as a result of her September 27, 2015 influenza ("flu") vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Speci
Summary: RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On February 21, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration as a result of her September 27, 2015 influenza ("flu") vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Specia..
More
RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1
NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On February 21, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration as a result of her September 27, 2015 influenza ("flu") vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On August 2, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent indicates as follows:
Medical personnel at the Division of Injury Compensation Programs, Department of Health and Human Services ("DICP"), have reviewed the petition and medical records filed in this case. Based on its review, DICP concluded that petitioner suffered a non-Table injury1 of SIRVA and that the preponderance of the medical evidence indicates that the injury was causally related to the flu vaccination she received on September 27, 2015. DICP did not identify any other causes for petitioner's SIRVA, and based on the medical records outlined above, petitioner met the statutory requirements by suffering the condition for more than six months. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-13(a)(1)(B); 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(D)(i). Therefore, based on the record asit now stands, compensation is appropriate, as petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.
Id. at 4-5.
In view of respondent's position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
Source: Leagle
