Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Burcham v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17-0720V. (2017)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20180315b78 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On May 31, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain-Barr Syndrome ("GBS") caused by the influenza vaccine she received on September 26, 2015, and that the symptoms of her GBS first occurred within 11 days of vaccination. Petition at 1, 4-7, 1
More

UNPUBLISHED

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On May 31, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome ("GBS") caused by the influenza vaccine she received on September 26, 2015, and that the symptoms of her GBS first occurred within 11 days of vaccination. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 4-7, 10. Petitioner also alleges that she received the vaccination in the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has received compensation or file a civil suit for her injury alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 4, 9-10.3 The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 15, 2017, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent "that petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the recently revised Vaccine Injury Table (Table) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (QAI), which afford petitioner a presumption of causation if the onset of GBS occurs between three and forty-two days after a seasonal flu vaccination and there is no apparent alternative cause." Id. at 3.

In view of respondent's position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. The petition contains two paragraphs, both labeled 9 and 10. This reference is to the second paragraphs labeled as such. See Petition at 1-2.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer