Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Franklin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 16-1598V. (2017)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20180316b78 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On December 1, 2016, Julia Franklin ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") after receiving an influenza ("flu") vaccine on November 19, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Spe
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On December 1, 2016, Julia Franklin ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") after receiving an influenza ("flu") vaccine on November 19, 2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 25, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On December 18, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner should be awarded a total of $80,774.10 (representing $80,000.00 for past and future pain and suffering, and $774.10 for past unreimbursed medical expenses). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $80,774.10 (representing $80,000.00 for past and future pain and suffering, and $774.10 for past unreimbursed medical expenses) in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Julia Franklin. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

The Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement on July 25, 2017. Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded compensation as follows:

A. $80,000.00, for past and future pain and suffering, and B. $774.10, for past unreimbursed medical expenses.

These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that petitioner be awarded a lump sum payment of $80,774.10 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer