Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey
Filed: Dec. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1272V Filed: November 9, 2018 UNPUBLISHED NICOLE MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; SECRETARY OF HEALTH Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder AND HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Justine Elizabeth Walters, U.S. Department of Justice, W
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1272V Filed: November 9, 2018 UNPUBLISHED NICOLE MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; SECRETARY OF HEALTH Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder AND HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Justine Elizabeth Walters, U.S. Department of Justice, Wa..
More
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-1272V
Filed: November 9, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
NICOLE MARSHALL,
Petitioner,
v. Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
AND HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)
Respondent.
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
petitioner.
Justine Elizabeth Walters, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On September 15, 2017, Nicole Marshall (“petitioner”) filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a
shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of receiving an
influenza (“flu”) vaccination in her left arm on August 29, 2016. Petition at 1. The case
was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On June 18, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled
to compensation. On November 9, 2018, respondent filed a proffer on award of
1
The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with
Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $90,000.00 in actual
and projected pain and suffering reduced to net present value and $5,470.95 for past
unreimbursable expenses for a total of $95,470.95. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer,
respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the
record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated
in the Proffer.
Id.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards
petitioner a lump sum payment of $95,470.95 (representing $90,000,00 in actual
and projected pain and suffering reduced to net present value and $5,470.95 for
past unreimbursable expenses) in the form of a check payable to petitioner,
Nicole Marshall. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
available under § 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
____________________________________
)
NICOLE MARSHALL, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
v. ) No. 17-1272V
) Chief Special Master Dorsey
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) SPU
HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
____________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On September 15, 2017, petitioner, Nicole Marshall, filed a petition for compensation
under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”),
alleging that she developed a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a
result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on August 29, 2016. On June 15, 2018,
respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that petitioner is entitled to compensation for
SIRVA. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in
Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report. On June 18, 2018, Chief Special Master Dorsey issued a Ruling
on Entitlement finding that petitioner is entitled to compensation for SIRVA.
I. Items of Compensation
A. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $90,000.00 in actual and projected
pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been
reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable
expenses related to her SIRVA. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past
unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $5,470.95. Petitioner agrees.
C. Medicaid Lien
Petitioner represents that there are no outstanding Medicaid liens against her.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment of $95,470.95 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 This
represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
15(a). Petitioner agrees.
Respectfully submitted,
JOSEPH H. HUNT
Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
GABRIELLE M. FIELDING
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
1
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical
expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
-2-
s/ Justine Walters__________
JUSTINE WALTERS
Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Tel: (202) 307-6393
DATE: November 9, 2018
-3-