In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 17-0682V
                                      Filed: June 19, 2018
                                         UNPUBLISHED


    TANITHA JACKSON, as the legal
    representative of her minor son, D.E.,

                        Petitioner,                          Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    v.                                                       Attorneys’ Fees and Costs

    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                       Respondent.


Curtis R. Webb, Twin Falls, ID, for petitioner.
Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                      DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

       On May 23, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine
Act”). Petitioner alleges that that D.E. developed an abscess requiring surgery as a
result of his measles, mumps and rubella (“MMR”) vaccine, pneumococcal 13-valent
conjugate (“PCV 13”) vaccine, hepatitis A (“Hep A”) vaccine, influenza (“flu”) vaccine,
and varicella vaccine administered on October 13, 2016. Petition at 1-3. On March 27,
2018, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on
the respondent’s proffer. (ECF No. 27).


1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       On May 31, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (ECF
No. 32). Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $17,325.90 and attorneys’
costs in the amount of $2,288.87. 

Additionally, in compliance with General
Order #9, petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred $185.00
in out-of-pocket expenses. (ECF No. 33). Thus, the total amount requested is
$19,799.77.

        On June 11, 2018, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion. (ECF No.
35). Respondent argues that “[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13
contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an
award of attorneys’ fees and costs.” 

Respondent adds, however, that he “is
satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in
this case.” 

Respondent “respectfully recommends that the Chief Special
Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees
and costs.” 

      Petitioner has filed no reply.

      The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s
request. In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the
undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates with the following
exception.

        Billing records submitted show time was billed on training staff. On March 15,
2017, 2.50 hours was billed as “Organized medical records. Trained Katharine on
organizing medical records.” (ECF No. 32 at 13). It is unclear who “Katharine” is or what
her role is regarding the case. Recovery of attorneys' fees and costs is limited by the
Vaccine Act to reasonable fees and costs “incurred in any proceeding” on a vaccine
petition. § 15(e)(1); Young v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 16-602V, 

, at *3 (Fed. Cl. Aug. 31, 2017) (finding time spent training staff is not
compensable). Therefore, the undersigned reduced the fees requested by $250.00.

      The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
§ 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned
GRANTS petitioner’s motion for reduced attorneys’ fees and costs.




                                            2
        Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $19,549.77 3 as follows:

             •   A lump sum of $19,364.77, representing reimbursement for
                 attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable jointly to
                 petitioner and petitioner’s counsel, Curtis R. Webb; and

             •   A lump sum of $185.00, representing reimbursement for petitioner’s
                 costs, in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

        The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                           s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                           Nora Beth Dorsey
                                                           Chief Special Master




3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all

charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,

(Fed. Cir.1991).

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                      3