Filed: Feb. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2018
Summary: DISMISSAL ORDER LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY , Judge . Plaintiff, prose, Sishya Buddhi-Angavu, also known as Charles Orlando Fields, commenced this action on August 4, 2017 (docket entry no. 1). On October 5, 2017, the government filed a motion to dismiss this matter for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Clams ("RCFC") (docket entry no. 6).
Summary: DISMISSAL ORDER LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY , Judge . Plaintiff, prose, Sishya Buddhi-Angavu, also known as Charles Orlando Fields, commenced this action on August 4, 2017 (docket entry no. 1). On October 5, 2017, the government filed a motion to dismiss this matter for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Clams ("RCFC") (docket entry no. 6). O..
More
DISMISSAL ORDER
LYDIA KAY GRIGGSBY, Judge.
Plaintiff, prose, Sishya Buddhi-Angavu, also known as Charles Orlando Fields, commenced this action on August 4, 2017 (docket entry no. 1). On October 5, 2017, the government filed a motion to dismiss this matter for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Clams ("RCFC") (docket entry no. 6).
On January 18, 2018, the Court issued an Order that, among other things, directed plaintiff to respond to the government's motion to dismiss on or before February 8, 2018 (docket entry no. 14). In the Order, the Court also informed plaintiff that, should he fail to respond to the government's motion to dismiss by February 8, 2018, the Court would treat such failure to respond as a failure to comply with a court order and to prosecute this matter pursuant to RCFC 41(b). Plaintiff did not file a response to the government's motion to dismiss by February 8, 2018.
And so, the Court:
1. DISMISSES the complaint without prejudice, pursuant to RCFC 41(b); and
2. Directs the Clerk's Office to ENTER final judgment consistent with this Order. No costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
