Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FMS Investment Corp. v. U.S., . 18-275C (2018)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20180326756 Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER THOMAS C. WHEELER , Judge . On March 23, 2018, the Court held a status conference in the above-captioned consolidated bid protest to discuss (1) the Government's notice that the Department of Education ("ED") is unlikely to proceed with continued litigation in this matter, Dkt. No. 149; (2) Plaintiffs' motions to supplement the administrative record ("AR"); and (3) Defendant-Intervenor Performant Recovery, Inc.'s ("Performant") motion to disqualify Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
More

ORDER

On March 23, 2018, the Court held a status conference in the above-captioned consolidated bid protest to discuss (1) the Government's notice that the Department of Education ("ED") is unlikely to proceed with continued litigation in this matter, Dkt. No. 149; (2) Plaintiffs' motions to supplement the administrative record ("AR"); and (3) Defendant-Intervenor Performant Recovery, Inc.'s ("Performant") motion to disqualify Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP ("Pillsbury") as counsel for Plaintiff Continental Service Group, Inc. ("ConServe"), Dkt. No. 110. As discussed during the status conference, the Government shall produce the following sets of documents to Plaintiffs:

1. Full evaluation records underlying the December 2016 award decision for all current protestors and awardees, including but not limited to complete 2016 evaluations, full 2016 proposals, the Memorandum of Law submitted to GAO, and the Contracting Officer's statement of facts submitted to GAO; 2. All documents related to the 2015 Focused Review of all current protestors and the two awardees; 3. All documents related to monthly call monitoring reviews for all ATE contractors since 2015; 4. All documents (including non-privileged agency communications) related to the appearance of a conflict of interest between Secretary of Education Betsy Devos and Performant; 5. All documents (including non-privileged agency communications) related to ED officials attempting to influence the award decision; and 6. All documentation of communications between ED evaluators, "points of contact," and "clients" identified in the past performance evaluation documents.

The Court notes that these documents need not be filed with the Court and will not be supplemented to the AR. Plaintiffs are free to utilize and attach any relevant documents from this production to any future briefs filed in this matter. All other requests in Plaintiffs' motions (Dkt. Nos. 133, 135, 136, 137, 138, 141, 142, 145, 148, and 150) are DENIED. The Government shall file a notice with the Court indicating when it is able to produce the above documents to Plaintiffs on or before Wednesday, March 28, 2018. Further, the Government is ordered to file a notice with the Court informing the parties of ED's timeline for announcing its final decision on how it plans to proceed in this litigation on or before Wednesday, April 11, 2018. The MJAR briefing schedule for all parties in this matter shall remain suspended.

Lastly, Performant's motion to disqualify (Dkt. No. 110) is GRANTED. Pillsbury is disqualified as counsel for ConServe in this matter effective immediately. The Court will issue a more substantive opinion on this issue in the coming days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer