LOREN A. SMITH, Senior Judge.
On July 25, 2018, plaintiff, Jason Brown, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint with this Court, along with a Motion to proceed in forma paupeis. In his Complaint, plaintiff alleges that Congress compromised his identity and committed a Fifth Amendment taking by introducing several bills identified by the last four digits of plaintiff's social security number. Plaintiff seeks $2.5 million in monetary damages for the alleged offenses.
Dismissal is required upon a determination that an action is frivolous or malicious. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c)(2)(B)(i). Frivolous complaints are "those in which the factual allegations are so unbelievable that there is no need for an evidentiary hearing to determine their veracity." Taylor v. United States, 568 F. App'x 890, 891 (Fed. Cir. 2014); see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989) (frivolous claims include those that describe "fantastic or delusional scenarios"). A court is required to dismiss a frivolous complaint from a litigant who is proceeding in forma pauperis.
Mr. Brown has a history of filing frivolous complaints in other Courts. See Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Resources, No. 18-544 (E.D. Pa.) (dismissing plaintiff's claim as malicious); Brown v. City of Philadelphia, No. 17-3242 (EX). Pa.) (dismissing claim as frivolous); Brown v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, No. 17-2929 (E.D. Pa.) (dismissing plaintiff's action as frivolous and for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)), In the present action, plaintiff's complaint alleges that "the serial number being known as (2682) in which it is attached to my social security number has been taken by the U.S. Congress. . The visible behavior of the Congress is a taking and comprlolmi se of identity in regards to public use of the serial number." Complaint (hereinafter "Comps.") at 2. Plaintiff's allegations are fanciful and require no evidentiary hearing to determine their veracity. The mere coincidence that the last four digits of plaintiff's social security number have been used to identify different Congressional Bills does not constitute a taking. Upon sua sponte review, this Court finds that plaintiff's Complaint is a frivolous action that requires no evidentiary hearing.
As such, plaintiff's complaint is, sua sponte,