NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On June 30, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,
On May 7, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. (ECF No. 35.) Petitioner requests attorneys' fees in the amount of $22,410.00 and attorneys' costs in the amount of $2,452.03. Id. at 1. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (ECF No. 34). Thus, the total amount requested is $24,862.03.
On May 8, 2018, respondent filed a response to petitioner's motion. (ECF No. 36). Respondent argues that "[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13 contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an award of attorneys' fees and costs." Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that he "is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys' fees and costs are met in this case." Id. at 2. Respondent "respectfully recommends that the Chief Special Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys' fees and costs." Id. at 3.
Petitioner has filed no reply.
The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request and finds a reduction in the amount of fees to be awarded appropriate for the reasons listed below.
Petitioner requests compensation for Mr. Kastner at a rate of $450 per hour for time billed from 2017 - 2018. (ECF No. 35-1 at 2). Mr. Kastner has been a licensed attorney since 1979, placing him in the 31 plus years' experience range. Id. at 1. The undersigned notes that the requested rate exceeds this Court's Attorneys' Hourly Rate Fee Schedule for attorneys with 31 plus years of experience. Under the Court's Fee Schedule, an attorney with 31 plus years of experience is entitled to hourly rates between $394 - $440 for work performed in 2017 and $407 - $455 for work performed in 2018.
It is firmly rooted that billing for clerical and other secretarial work is not permitted in the Vaccine Program. Rochester v. United States, 18 Cl.Ct. 379, 387 (1989) (denied an award of fees for time billed by a secretary and found that "[these] services . . . should be considered as normal overhead office costs included within the attorneys' fees rates"); Mostovoy v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 2016 WL 720969, *5 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 4, 2016). On June 26, 2017 a total of 1.5 hours was billed as "Mail all pleading and exhibit binders to U.S. Federal Court of Claims; Mail copy to Secretary of Health and Human Services; Prepare Certificate of Service". (ECF No.35-1 at 5). These tasks are considered administrative and are not billable. The undersigned
In the Vaccine Program, special masters traditionally have compensated time spent traveling when no other work was being performed at one-half an attorney's hourly rate. See Hocraffer v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 99-533V, 2011 WL 3705153, at *24 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. July 25, 2011); Rodriguez v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 06-559V, 2009 WL 2568468, at *21 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jul. 27, 2009); English v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 01-61V, 2006 WL 3419805, at *12-13 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Nov. 9, 2006). However, special masters should not use this rule as standard practice but rather "[e]ach case should be assessed on its own merits." Gruber v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 91 Fed. Cl. 773, 791 (2010). "Even an automatic 50% award may be too high for an undocumented claim, given the possibility that an attorney may use the travel time to work on another matter or not to work at all while traveling." Id.
On February 13, 2017, petitioners counsel billed 1.5 hours as "Meeting with Dr. Scachs at his office re: client's injuries and potential vaccine claim; Travel". (ECF No. 35-1 at 4). The undersigned notes that counsel has grouped multiple activities into a single time entry making a line-by-line analysis nearly impossible. See, e.g. Riggins v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 99-38V, 2009 WL 3319818, at *23-24 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 15, 2009). Attorney's are advised that "[e]ach task should have its own line entry indicating the amount of time spent on that task" and that "[l]umping together several unrelated tasks in the same time entry frustrates the courts ability to assess the reasonableness of the request." Guidelines for Practice Under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program at 68.
Petitioner requests reimbursement for attorney costs in the amount of $2,452.03.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner's request, the undersigned
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.