Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Buras v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17-1012V. (2018)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20180906a09 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 08, 2018
Latest Update: May 08, 2018
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On July 27, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccination administered on October 19, 2016. Petition at 1, 10. The case was assigned to the Special
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On July 27, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccination administered on October 19, 2016. Petition at 1, 10. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 13, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a SIRVA. On May 4, 2018, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner should be awarded $92,500.00 and $3,163.33 to satisfy a State of Mississippi Medicaid lien. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards

(1) Petitioner a lump sum payment of $92,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Ricky Buras. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a); and (2) A lump sum payment of $3,163.33, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Mississippi Medicaid Lien, payable jointly to petitioner3 and to: Magnolia Health 5615 High Point Drive, Suite 100 Irving, TX 75038 Recipient ID: MS01382297822 Case Number: 105352

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items

On April 9, 2018, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Thereafter, on April 13, 2108, Chief Special Master Dorsey issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for his Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration ("SIRVA"). Based on the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $92,500.00. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a), with the exception of the reimbursement of the Medicaid lien, below. Petitioner agrees.

Respondent further proffers that petitioner, Ricky Buras, should be awarded funds to satisfy a State of Mississippi Medicaid lien in the amount of $3,163.33, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the State of Mississippi may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments that the State of Mississippi has made to or on behalf of Ricky Buras from the date of his eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of his vaccine-related injury suffered on or about October 19, 2016, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through two lump sum payments as described below:

(1) A lump sum payment of $92,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 (2) A lump sum payment of $3,163.33, representing compensation for satisfaction of the State of Mississippi Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and to: Magnolia Health 5615 High Point Drive, Suite 100 Irving, TX 75038 Recipient ID: MS01382297822 Case Number: 105352

Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to Magnolia Health.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/Traci R. Patton TRACI R. PATTON Senior Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Telephone: (202) 353-1589 Dated: May 4, 2018

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to Magnolia Health.
4. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer