NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On October 6, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,
On May 3, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. ECF No. 17. Petitioner requested attorneys' fees in the amount of $7,518.75 and attorneys' costs in the amount of $519.62. Id. at 6. On October 1, 2018, petitioner filed a supplemental motion for attorney fees and costs in the amount of $1,256.79.
On May 14, 2018, respondent filed a response to petitioner's motion. ECF No. 18. Respondent argued that "[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13 contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an award of attorneys' fees and costs." Id. at 1. Respondent added, however, that he "is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys' fees and costs are met in this case." Id. at 2. Respondent "respectfully recommends that the Chief Special Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys' fees and costs." Id. at 3. On October 4, 2018, respondent filed a response to petitioner's supplemental motion for attorneys' fees and costs. ECF No. 28. Respondent reiterated his position from the original response filing. Petitioner filed no reply.
The undersigned reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request and found a reduction in the amount of fees to be awarded appropriate. On October 31, 2018, the undersigned issued a decision awarding $8,561.66 for attorneys' fees and costs. ECF No. 31. The award was made payable to petitioner and petitioner's counsel jointly.
On November 15, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration. ECF No. 32. Petitioner argued that since the case had been dismissed for failure to prosecute due to petitioner's own failure to maintain contact with counsel, the award for attorneys' fees should be made payable to counsel alone. Id. Counsel noted that the docket reflects counsel's inability to contact petitioner despite persistent efforts and that "petitioner's counsel has a reasonable expectation that petitioner will not cooperate in negotiating a check made payable jointly . . ." Id. Petitioner sought no further relief from the undersigned's October 31, 2018 decision.
On November 15, 2018, the undersigned issued an order granting petitioner's motion to the extent of withdrawing the October 31, 2018 decision for further review. ECF No. 33. Respondent was order to file a response to the motion, if any, by November 29, 2018. Id. Respondent filed no reply.
The undersigned's prior decision already having been withdrawn, the undersigned now issues this superseding decision pursuant to Vaccine Rule 10(e)(3)(A).
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Counsel must submit fee requests that include contemporaneous and specific billing records indicating the service performed, the number of hours expended on the service, and the name of the person performing the service. See Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313, 316-18 (2008). Counsel should not include in their fee requests hours that are "excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary." Saxton v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). It is "well within the special master's discretion to reduce the hours to a number that, in [her] experience and judgment, [is] reasonable for the work done." Id. at 1522. Furthermore, the special master may reduce a fee request sua sponte, apart from objections raised by respondent and without providing a petitioner notice and opportunity to respond. See Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 209 (2009). A special master need not engage in a line-by-line analysis of petitioner's fee application when reducing fees. Broekelschen v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 102 Fed. Cl. 719, 729 (2011).
The petitioner "bears the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and the expenses incurred." Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. at 482, 484 (1991). He "should present adequate proof [of the attorneys' fees and costs sought] at the time of the submission." Id. at 484 n.1.
Petitioner requests compensation for attorney David A. Kulwicki at the rate of $400 per hour. ECF No. 17 at 4. The undersigned finds the requested rate excessive based on his overall legal experience, the quality of work performed, and the lack of experience in the Vaccine Program.
Mr. Kulwicki falls within the 20-30 years' experience range for his work performed through the entirety of this case. Hourly rates within the 20-30 years of experience in the vaccine program are as follows: $358 — $424 for work performed in 2017 and $370 — $439 for work performed in 2018. These rates are derived from the OSM Attorneys' Forum Hourly Rate Schedules available on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims website at www.cofc.uscourts.gov/node/2914. The undersigned incorporates by reference all of the explanatory notes contained in these rate schedules. See also McCulloch, 2015 WL 5634323, at *19.
Although Mr. Kulwicki is an experienced attorney, his experience in the Vaccine Program is limited and does not support the higher end of the experience range. The undersigned reduces Mr. Kulwicki's hourly rates as follows: $358 per hour for work performed in 2017 and $370.00 for work performed in 2018. The undersigned finds that the proposed paralegal rate of $125 per hour reasonable. Therefore, attorneys' fees
Petitioner requests compensation for attorney costs in the amount of $1,256.79. These costs include medical records, filing fees and postal charges. The undersigned finds the overall request for attorney costs reasonable and awards the request in full.
Due to petitioner's failure to maintain communication with counsel, counsel requests that the award of attorneys' fees and costs be made directly payable to counsel and not jointly with petitioner. ECF No. 32. Under the specific facts and circumstances of this case, the undersigned is persuaded that petitioner's counsel is correct in asserting that he "has a reasonable expectation that petitioner will not cooperate in negotiating a check made payable jointly . . ." Id.
Awards of attorneys' fees and costs are made payable jointly to petitioner and counsel because they are considered an element of petitioner's compensation. However, where counsel cannot obtain the signature of petitioner through no fault of his own:
Gitestanti v. Sec'y Health & Human Servs. No. 09-799V, 2011 WL 5025006, at *7 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 30, 2011)(emphasis added); see also Tutza v. Sec'y Health & Human Servs., No. 04-223V, 2012 WL 2362594 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 20, 2012); Turner v. Sec'y Health & Human Servs., No. 02-1437V, 2014 WL 1493119 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Mar. 26, 2014). Moreover, respondent has raised no objection.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner's request, the undersigned
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.