Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 16-415 (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 16-415 Visitors: 4
Judges: Christian J. Moran
Filed: Dec. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ******************** * WILLIE JOHNSON, * * No. 16-415V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: November 14, 2019 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * shoulder injury related to vaccine * administration (“SIRVA”) Respondent. * ******************** * Bruce W. Slane, White Plains, NY for Petitioner; Gabrielle M. Fielding, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washi
More
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

******************** *
WILLIE JOHNSON,          *
                         *                         No. 16-415V
             Petitioner, *                         Special Master Christian J. Moran
                         *
v.                       *                         Filed: November 14, 2019
                         *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH      *                         Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine;
AND HUMAN SERVICES,      *                         shoulder injury related to vaccine
                         *                         administration (“SIRVA”)
             Respondent. *
******************** *

Bruce W. Slane, White Plains, NY for Petitioner;
Gabrielle M. Fielding, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for
Respondent.

                             UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

       On November 13, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the
petition for compensation filed by Willie Johnson on April 1, 2016. Petitioner
alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on June 27, 2013, which is
contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), caused
him to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”).
Petitioner further alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more
than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or
settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his injury.

       Respondent denies that the vaccines either caused or significantly
aggravated petitioner’s alleged injury or any other injury, and denies that
petitioner's current disabilities are the result of a vaccine-related injury.

       1
         The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and
Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its
website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing
redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4).
Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
      Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The
undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the
Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

       Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

       A lump sum payment of $42,000.00 in the form of a check payable to
       petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
       would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

       In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B,
the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 16-415V according to this decision
and the attached stipulation.2

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                     s/Christian J. Moran
                                                     Christian J. Moran
                                                     Special Master




       2
          Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each
party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal
Claims judge.
                                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer