Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey
Filed: Feb. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1178V Filed: January 11, 2019 UNPUBLISHED THERESA ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Attorneys’ Fees and Costs SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Bruce William Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner. Glenn Alexander MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 Dorsey, Chief Special M
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1178V Filed: January 11, 2019 UNPUBLISHED THERESA ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Attorneys’ Fees and Costs SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Bruce William Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner. Glenn Alexander MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 Dorsey, Chief Special Ma..
More
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-1178V
Filed: January 11, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
THERESA ANDERSON,
Petitioner,
v. Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Bruce William Slane, Law Office of Bruce W. Slane, P.C., White Plains, NY, for
petitioner.
Glenn Alexander MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
respondent.
DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On August 31, 2017, Theresa Anderson (“petitioner”) filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left
shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), including a left rotator cuff
tear, tendinopathy, partial tears of the supraspinatus tendon, a partial laminating tear
within the infraspinatus muscle and tendon, left shoulder impingement syndrome, and
1 The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with
Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
bursitis of the left shoulder, as a consequence of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine she
received on or about September 4, 2016. Petition at 1. On December 11, 2018, the
undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the
parties’ stipulation. ECF No. 30.
On December 20, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.
ECF No. 34. Petitioner requests attorneys’ fees in the amount of $18,607.55 and
attorneys’ costs in the amount of $1,214.86.
Id. at 1. In compliance with General Order
#9, petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket
expenses.
Id. at 2. Thus, the total amount requested is $19,822.41.
On December 21, 2018, respondent filed a response to petitioner’s motion. ECF
No. 35. Respondent argues that “[n]either the Vaccine Act nor Vaccine Rule 13
contemplates any role for respondent in the resolution of a request by a petitioner for an
award of attorneys’ fees and costs.”
Id. at 1. Respondent adds, however, that he “is
satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in
this case.”
Id. at 2. Respondent “respectfully recommends that the Chief Special
Master exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys’ fees
and costs.”
Id. at 3.
Petitioner has filed no reply.
The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner’s
request. In the undersigned’s experience, the request appears reasonable, and the
undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.§
15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned GRANTS
petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.
Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $19,822.413 as a lump
sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner’s counsel
Bruce William Slane.
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4
3This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all
charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered.
Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would
be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,
924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).
4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3