Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17-1643 (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 17-1643 Visitors: 4
Judges: Thomas L. Gowen
Filed: Dec. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: December 9, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * DARLENE LOPEZ, * Unpublished * Petitioner, * No. 17-1643V * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation for Award; Influenza AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury * Related to Vaccine Administration Respondent. * (“SIRVA”). * * * * * * * * * * * * * Mark T. Sadaka, Mark T. Sadaka, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for petitioner. Ryan D. Pyles, U.S. Dept.
More
               In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                    OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                        Filed: December 9, 2019

* * * * * * *                   *   *    *  * *   *
DARLENE LOPEZ,                              *               Unpublished
                                            *
              Petitioner,                   *               No. 17-1643V
                                            *
v.                                          *               Special Master Gowen
                                            *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                         *               Stipulation for Award; Influenza
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                         *               (“flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
                                            *               Related to Vaccine Administration
              Respondent.                   *               (“SIRVA”).
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mark T. Sadaka, Mark T. Sadaka, LLC, Englewood, NJ, for petitioner.
Ryan D. Pyles, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

                                     DECISION FOR STIPULATION1

        On October 31, 2017, Darlene Lopez (“petitioner”), filed a petition for compensation
under the National Vaccine Injury Program.2 Petition (ECF No. 1). Petitioner received an
influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 13, 2014. Petition at Preamble; Stipulation at ¶ 2 (ECF
No. 46). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving the flu vaccination, she suffered a
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), acute neuropathy, paresthesia,
and bilateral upper extremity weakness. Petition at Preamble; Stipulation at ¶ 4.

         On December 6, 2019, respondent filed a stipulation providing that a decision should be
entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 7. Respondent denies that the flu
vaccine is the cause of petitioner’s alleged injuries, or any other injury or her current condition.
Id. at ¶
6. Nevertheless, maintaining their respective positions, the parties now agree that the

1
  Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a
reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of
Federal Claims. The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. This means the
opinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the opinion is posted on the court’s
website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party:
(1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that
includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the
decision.” 
Id. If neither
party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the
court’s website without any changes. 
Id. 2 The
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012)
(Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. §
300aa.
issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the
compensation to petitioner according to the terms of the stipulation attached hereto as Appendix
A. 
Id. at ¶
7.

        The stipulation provides:

        1) A lump sum payment of $1,536.60, representing compensation for satisfaction of
           a State of California Medicaid lien, payable jointly to petitioner and:

                                       Department of Health Care Services
                                           Recovery Branch-MS 4720
                                           Re: # C90309225C-VAC03
                                                P.O. Box 997421
                                          Sacramento, CA 95899-7421.

                 Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to the State; and

        2) A lump sum of $28,463.40 in the form of a check payable to the petitioner. This
           amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under
           42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

       I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount
and on the terms set forth therein. The Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in
accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3

        IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                                                s/Thomas L. Gowen
                                                                                Thomas L. Gowen
                                                                                Special Master




3
 Entry of judgment is expediated by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule
11(a).

                                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer