Filed: Jan. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2019
Summary: Not to be Published DISMISSAL DECISION 1 LAURA D. MILLMAN , Special Master . On September 20, 2017, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10-34 (2012), alleging that a pneumococcal (Prevnar 13) vaccination she received on June 13, 2016 caused her transverse myelitis ("TM"). Pet. at 1, 3, 9, and 10. Petitioner filed her medical records and affidavit, but not an expert report in support of her allegations. On July 17, 2018, resp
Summary: Not to be Published DISMISSAL DECISION 1 LAURA D. MILLMAN , Special Master . On September 20, 2017, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10-34 (2012), alleging that a pneumococcal (Prevnar 13) vaccination she received on June 13, 2016 caused her transverse myelitis ("TM"). Pet. at 1, 3, 9, and 10. Petitioner filed her medical records and affidavit, but not an expert report in support of her allegations. On July 17, 2018, respo..
More
Not to be Published
DISMISSAL DECISION1
LAURA D. MILLMAN, Special Master.
On September 20, 2017, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10-34 (2012), alleging that a pneumococcal (Prevnar 13) vaccination she received on June 13, 2016 caused her transverse myelitis ("TM"). Pet. at ¶¶ 1, 3, 9, and 10.
Petitioner filed her medical records and affidavit, but not an expert report in support of her allegations.
On July 17, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) Report recommending against entitlement, noting that petitioner had not filed an expert report or other reliable medical evidence to support her allegations. Resp't Rep. at 6.
On January 24, 2019, petitioner filed a Motion for a Decision Dismissing Petition stating, "An investigation of the facts and science supporting this case, including consultation with qualified expert [sic] and treating physicians, has demonstrated to Petitioner that she will be unable to prove that she is entitled to compensation in the Vaccine Program." Mot. at 1.
This is a causation in fact case. Petitioner's medical records do not support her allegations by a preponderance of the evidence and she has failed to file a medical opinion from an expert in support of her allegations. The undersigned finds petitioner has failed to make a prima facie case. The undersigned GRANTS petitioner's motion and DISMISSES this petition.
DISCUSSION
To satisfy her burden of proving causation in fact, petitioner must prove by preponderant evidence: "(1) a medical theory causally connecting the vaccination and the injury; (2) a logical sequence of cause and effect showing that the vaccination was the reason for the injury; and (3) a showing of a proximate temporal relationship between vaccination and injury." Althen v. Sec'y of HHS, 418 F.3d 1274, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2005). In Althen, the Federal Circuit quoted its opinion in Grant v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 956 F.2d 1144, 1148 (Fed. Cir. 1992):
A persuasive medical theory is demonstrated by "proof of a logical sequence of cause of and effect showing that the vaccination was the reason for the injury [,]" the logical sequence being supported by a "reputable medical or scientific explanation[,]" i.e., "evidence in the form of scientific studies or expert medical testimony[.]"
418 F.3d at 1278.
Without more, "evidence showing an absence of other causes does not meet petitioner's affirmative duty to show actual or legal causation." Grant, 956 F.2d at 1149. Mere temporal association is not sufficient to prove causation in fact. Id. at 1148.
Petitioner must show not only that but for Prevnar 13 vaccine, she would not have TM, but also that Prevnar 13 vaccine was a substantial factor in causing her TM. Shyface v. Sec'y of HHS, 165 F.3d 1344, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
The Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-13(a)(1), prohibits the undersigned from ruling for petitioner based solely on her allegations unsubstantiated by medical records or medical opinion. The medical records do not support petitioner's allegations. Her treating doctors do not attribute her TM to Prevnar 13 vaccine. Petitioner has not filed a medical expert opinion in support of her allegations although she has done an extensive search for an expert.
The undersigned GRANTS petitioner's motion and DISMISSES this petition for failure to make a prima facie case of causation in fact.
CONCLUSION
This case is now DISMISSED. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
