MINDY MICHAELS ROTH, Special Master.
On October 1, 2014, petitioner filed a petition for Vaccine Compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program ("the Program"),
To receive compensation under the Program, petitioner must prove either 1) that she suffered a "Table Injury" — i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table — corresponding to her vaccination, or 2) that she suffered an injury that was actually caused by a vaccine. See §§ 13(a)(1)(A) and 11(c)(1). An examination of the record did not uncover any evidence that petitioner suffered a "Table Injury." Further, the record does not contain persuasive evidence indicating that petitioner's alleged injury was vaccine-caused or in any way vaccine-related.
Under the Act, petitioner may not be given a Program award based solely on the petitioner's claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by either medical records or by the opinion of a competent physician. § 13(a)(1). In this case, because there are insufficient medical records supporting petitioner's claim, a medical opinion must be offered in support. Because there was an onset issue in this case determined by fact hearing, and though petitioner offered a medical opinion, that medical opinion was insufficient to support a finding of entitlement due to lack of temporal relationship.
Accordingly, it is clear from the record in this case that petitioner has failed to demonstrate either that she suffered a "Table Injury" or that her injuries were "actually caused" by a vaccination.