Cook v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-255V. (2019)
Court: United States Court of Federal Claims
Number: infdco20190514973
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1 THOMAS L. GOWEN , Special Master . On April 16, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal in the above-captioned case. ECF No. 30. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Pursuant to the E-Government Act o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1 THOMAS L. GOWEN , Special Master . On April 16, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal in the above-captioned case. ECF No. 30. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Pursuant to the E-Government Act of..
More
UNPUBLISHED
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
THOMAS L. GOWEN, Special Master.
On April 16, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal in the above-captioned case. ECF No. 30. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court's website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. This means the opinion will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. Before the opinion is posted on the court's website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction "of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy." Vaccine Rule 18(b). "An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision." Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the court's website without any changes. Id.
Source: Leagle
