THOMAS L. GOWEN, Special Master.
On February 25, 2019, Robert B. Rhodes ("Petitioner") filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. Petitioner's Motion for Attorney Fees ("Fees App.") (ECF No. 73). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned
On May 20, 2016, Petitioner filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
On February 25, 2019, Petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. Petitioner requests compensation for his attorney, Ms. Nancy Meyers, in the total amount of $44,620.23, representing $35,968.50 in attorneys' fees and $8,651.73 in costs. Fees App. at 1. Pursuant to General Order No. 9, Petitioner warrants that he not personally incurred any costs in pursuit of this litigation. Fees App. Ex. 1 at 2. Respondent reacted to the fees motion on March 19, 2019, indicating that "Respondent is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys' fees and costs are met in this case" and recommending that "the special master exercise his discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorneys' fees and costs." Response at 2-3 (ECF No. 74). Petitioner filed a reply on March 19, 2019, concurring with Respondent's recommendation that I exercise my discretion and determine a reasonable award of fees and costs. Reply at 1 (ECF No. 75).
Under the Vaccine Act, the special master may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs for a petition that does not result in an award of compensation, but was filed in good faith and supported by a reasonable basis. § 300aa-15(e)(1). In this case, Petitioner was awarded compensation pursuant to a stipulation, and therefore he is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
Petitioners "bea[r] the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and the expenses incurred" are reasonable. Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. 482, 484 (1993). Adequate proof of the claimed fees and costs should be presented when the motion is filed. Id. at 484 n. 1. The special master has the discretion to reduce awards sua sponte, independent of enumerated objections from the respondent. Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 208-09 (Fed. Cl. 2009); Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313 (Fed. Cl. 2008), aff'd No. 99-537V, 2008 WL 2066611 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Apr. 22, 2008).
Petitioner requests the following rates of compensation for his attorney, Ms. Meyers: $350.00 per hour for work performed in 2015-2017, $375.00 per hour for work performed in 2018, and $390.00 per hour for work performed in 2019. Fees App. Ex.2 at 2. The rates for 2015-2018 are consistent with what Ms. Meyers has previously been awarded for her Vaccine Program work and is reasonable. See Porges v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 15-427V, 2018 WL 2772241, at*3 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. May 7, 2018); Drake v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 16-732V, 2018 WL 4391065, at*2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Aug. 20, 2018). Additionally, her requested rate for 2019 is reasonable given her years of experience, quality of work, and overall reputation in the Vaccine Program. Accordingly, no adjustment to the requested rates is required. However, Ms. Meyers billed several entries at various points between 2015-2017 at $375.00 per hour despite most of the entries in that time period being billed at $350.00 per hour in accordance with what the Court has previously awarded her. In sum, these erroneous entries total 7.4 hours. I will therefore reduce the award of fees by
Upon review of the submitted billing statement, I find the overall hours spent on this matter require a minor reduction. The hours billed by Ms. Meyers (57.8) appear reasonable upon review. The hours billed by paralegals (103.7), however, appear somewhat excessive. There are multiple entries indicating that paralegals billed time for non-compensable administrative/clerical tasks such as scanning and preparing documents. See Rochester v. United States, 18 Cl. Ct. 379, 387 (1989). These entries typically combined administrative tasks with other compensable tasks into one larger entry (e.g., entries on 9/25/15, 3/30/16, 10/19/17, 6/27/18, 6/28/18). Paralegals also routinely billed 0.2 hours or more on downloading file-stamped versions of documents filed and calendaring deadlines, which is excessive in my experience (e.g., entries on 10/26/16, 8/14/17, 5/9/18, 5/10/18, 6/12/18, 7/13/18).
For these reasons, I will reduce the time billed by paralegals by 5% as I have in the past for similar issues. See Dileo v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 16-1639V, 2019 WL 1149785, at *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 21, 2019). This results in a reduction of
Like attorneys' fees, a request for reimbursement of costs must be reasonable. Perreira v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34 (Fed. Cl. 1992). Petitioner requests total attorneys' costs in the amount of $8,651.73, comprising of the cost of acquiring medical records, postage, and the expert work of Dr. Lawrence Steinman. Fees App. Ex. 2 at 2. Petitioner has provided adequate documentation supporting all these costs, and they shall be reimbursed in full. Petitioner is therefore entitled to final attorneys' costs of
In accordance with the foregoing, Petitioner's motion for attorneys' fees and costs is
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.