NORA BETH DORSEY, Chief Special Master.
On January 27, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,
On March 29, 2019, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. ECF No. 60. Petitioner requests attorneys' fees in the amount of $21,293.30 and attorneys' costs in the amount of $2,235.17. Id. at 11. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. Id. at 11. Thus, the total amount requested is $23,528.47.
On April 12, 2019, respondent filed a response to petitioner's motion. ECF No. 61. Respondent "does not object to the overall amount sought, as it is not an unreasonable amount to have been incurred for proceedings in this case to date. Respondent's lack of objection to the amount sought in this case should not be construed as admission, concession, or waiver as to the hourly rates requested, the number of hours billed, or the other litigation related costs." Id. at 1.
Through email correspondence on April 15, 2019, counsel for petitioner notified the undersigned that petitioner does not intend to file reply.
The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request and finds a reduction in the amount of fees to be awarded appropriate for the reason listed below.
The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Counsel must submit fee requests that include contemporaneous and specific billing records indicating the service performed, the number of hours expended on the service, and the name of the person performing the service. See Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313, 316-18 (2008). Counsel should not include in their fee requests hours that are "excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary." Saxton v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). It is "well within the special master's discretion to reduce the hours to a number that, in [her] experience and judgment, [is] reasonable for the work done." Id. at 1522. Furthermore, the special master may reduce a fee request sua sponte, apart from objections raised by respondent and without providing a petitioner notice and opportunity to respond. See Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 209 (2009). A special master need not engage in a line-by-line analysis of petitioner's fee application when reducing fees. Broekelschen v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 102 Fed. Cl. 719, 729 (2011).
The petitioner "bears the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and the expenses incurred." Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. at 482, 484 (1991). She "should present adequate proof [of the attorneys' fees and costs sought] at the time of the submission." Id. at 484 n.1. Petitioner's counsel "should make a good faith effort to exclude from a fee request hours that are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary, just as a lawyer in private practice ethically is obligated to exclude such hours from his fee submission." Hensley, 461 U.S., at 434.
Petitioner requests the following rates for work performed by attorney Jeffrey Pop and his staff:
ECF No. 60-2 at 2.
The requested rates for 2016 and 2017 have previously been awarded and will be awarded herein. Mr. Pop and his staff have also been awarded rates for work performed in 2018.
This results in a reduction of the attorneys' fees requested in the amount of
For 2019, the undersigned finds the requested rate increases reasonable given the undersigned's experience, the analysis of the McCulloch factors as applied to Mr. Pop and his associates and that Mr. Pop has not requested a rate increase since 2016. The undersigned awards the requested rates for Mr. Pop and Ms. Grigorian 2019 in full. In regards to Mr. Hahn, his requested rate is outside the range for 2016. The undersigned awards the rate of $156 for 2019. This reduces the request for attorney fees in the amount of
Petitioner requests reimbursement for attorneys' costs in the amount of $2,235.17. After reviewing petitioner's invoices, the undersigned finds no cause to reduce petitioner's' request and awards the full amount of attorneys' costs sought.
Based on the reasonableness of petitioner's request, the undersigned
The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.