Paternostro v. United States, 19-169L. (2019)
Court: United States Court of Federal Claims
Number: infdco20190925846
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER RYAN T. HOLTE , Judge . On 30 January 2019, plaintiff proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint with this Court. On 10 June 2019, defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). Plaintiff failed to respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss, which was due by 5 August 2019. On 22 August 2019, the Court gave plaintiff "an additional 28 days to file its Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss." Order, ECF 12. I
Summary: ORDER RYAN T. HOLTE , Judge . On 30 January 2019, plaintiff proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint with this Court. On 10 June 2019, defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). Plaintiff failed to respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss, which was due by 5 August 2019. On 22 August 2019, the Court gave plaintiff "an additional 28 days to file its Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss." Order, ECF 12. In..
More
ORDER
RYAN T. HOLTE, Judge.
On 30 January 2019, plaintiff proceeding pro se, filed his Complaint with this Court. On 10 June 2019, defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss pursuant to 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). Plaintiff failed to respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss, which was due by 5 August 2019. On 22 August 2019, the Court gave plaintiff "an additional 28 days to file its Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss." Order, ECF 12. In that Order, the Court required: "plaintiff to respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before 19 September 2019. If plaintiff fails to respond by this date, the Court will have no choice but to dismiss plaintiff's Complaint for failure to prosecute pursuant to RCFC 41(b)." Id.
As of today, 20 September 2019, the Court has not received plaintiff's Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. As such, the Court has no choice but to DISMISS plaintiff's case without prejudice for failure to prosecute, pursuant to RCFC 41(b). The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment consistent with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
