Gold v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1445V. (2019)
Court: United States Court of Federal Claims
Number: infdco20191030k82
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1 MINDY MICHAELS ROTH , Special Master . On September 25, 2019, petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in the above-captioned case. ECF No. 24. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Although this Decision h
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1 MINDY MICHAELS ROTH , Special Master . On September 25, 2019, petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in the above-captioned case. ECF No. 24. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Although this Decision ha..
More
UNPUBLISHED
ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1
MINDY MICHAELS ROTH, Special Master.
On September 25, 2019, petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in the above-captioned case. ECF No. 24. Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Although this Decision has been formally designated "unpublished," it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims's website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision's inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction "of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy." Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. Id.
Source: Leagle
