Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Christy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1021V. (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20200107b33 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Chief Special Master . On July 16, 2018, Sherri Christy filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she received a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis ("Tdap") vaccination on September 13, 2017, and thereafter suffered from a left-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA"). Petit
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On July 16, 2018, Sherri Christy filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she received a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis ("Tdap") vaccination on September 13, 2017, and thereafter suffered from a left-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA"). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On November 21, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On November 19, 2019, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4 report/Proffer on Award of Compensation ("Rule 4/Proffer") indicating Petitioner should be awarded $55,380.00 (including $380.00 for past unreimbursed expenses). Rule 4/Proffer at 3. In the Rule 4/Proffer, respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Rule 4/Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Rule 4/Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $55,380.00 (including $380.00 for past unreimbursed expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer