Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Moon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1233 (2020)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 18-1233 Visitors: 8
Judges: Brian H. Corcoran
Filed: Aug. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1233V (not to be published) LESLIE NAN MOON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, v. Filed: July 9, 2020 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Special Processing Unit (SPU); HUMAN SERVICES, Attorney’s Fees and Costs Respondent. Kelly Danielle Burdette, Burdette Law, PLLC, North Bend, WA, for Petitioner. Kimberly Shubert Davey, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On
More
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                   OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 18-1233V
                                        (not to be published)


    LESLIE NAN MOON,
                                                                Chief Special Master Corcoran
                         Petitioner,
    v.                                                          Filed: July 9, 2020


    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                     Special Processing Unit                 (SPU);
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                             Attorney’s Fees and Costs


                         Respondent.


Kelly Danielle Burdette, Burdette Law, PLLC, North Bend, WA, for Petitioner.

Kimberly Shubert Davey, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

                       DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1

        On August 17, 2018, Leslie Nan Moon (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for
compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C.
§300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder
injury related to vaccine administration as a result of an influenza vaccine administered
on January 11, 2018. (Petition at 1). On January 30, 2020, a decision was issued
awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the parties’ stipulation. (ECF No. 44).



1  Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic
Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the
internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from
public access.

2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
       Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated May 7, 2020,
(ECF No. 49), requesting a total award of $12,510.24 (representing $11,613.75 in fees
and $896.49 in costs). Pursuant to General Order #9, Petitioner filed a signed statement
indicating that she did not incur out-of-pocket expenses in pursuit of her claim. (Id. at 19).
Respondent did not file a response to the motion.

       I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner’s request. In my
experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested
hours or rates.

       The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. §
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney’s fees and costs. I
award a total of $12,510.24 (representing $11,613.75 in fees and $896.49 in costs) as a
lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel. In
the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court),
the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                               s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                                               Brian H. Corcoran
                                                               Chief Special Master




3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their
right to seek review.
                                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer