Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Caven v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1506 (2020)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 18-1506 Visitors: 4
Judges: Brian H. Corcoran
Filed: Jul. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1506V UNPUBLISHED KELLY CAVEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: June 24, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA) Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington
More
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                         No. 18-1506V
                                        UNPUBLISHED


    KELLY CAVEN,                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran

                        Petitioner,                          Filed: June 24, 2020
    v.
                                                             Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                  Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                          Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
                                                             Injury Related to Vaccine
                        Respondent.                          Administration (SIRVA)


Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.


                               DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

       On September 28, 2018, Kelly Caven filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered left shoulder injuries related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination received
on October 10, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

        On March 11, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled
to compensation for SIRVA. On June 23, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of
compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $125,000.00. Proffer
at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered


1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2
  National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa
(2012).
award.
Id. Based on the
record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award
as stated in the Proffer.

      Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
sum payment of $125,000.00, for pain and suffering, in the form of a check
payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that
would be available under § 15(a).

       The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.


                                          s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Chief Special Master




3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.


                                                      2
          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                     OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

    KELLY CAVEN,

                           Petitioner,
                                                          No. 18-1506v
          v.                                              Chief Special Master Corcoran (SPU)
                                                          ECF
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
    HUMAN SERVICES,

                           Respondent.

               RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I.        Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items

          On March 9, 2020, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner is

entitled to vaccine compensation for a Table injury of Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration suffered following receipt of an influenza vaccination on October 10, 2016. A

Ruling on Entitlement was issued on March 11, 2020.

          Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded

$125,000.00 for pain and suffering. This award represents all elements of compensation to

which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 1 Petitioner agrees.

II.       Form of the Award

          Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made

through a lump sum payment of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 2

Petitioner agrees.


1
  Should Petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief.
2
    Petitioner is a competent adult, therefore evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.


                                                    1
                           Respectfully submitted,

                           JOSEPH H. HUNT
                           Assistant Attorney General

                           C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
                           Acting Director
                           Torts Branch, Civil Division

                           CATHARINE E. REEVES
                           Deputy Director
                           Torts Branch, Civil Division

                           DARRYL WISHARD
                           Assistant Director
                           Torts Branch, Civil Division

                           /s/ Adriana Teitel
                           ADRIANA TEITEL
                           Trial Attorney
                           Torts Branch, Civil Division
                           U.S. Department of Justice
                           P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station
                           Washington, DC 20044-0146
                           Tel: (202) 616-3677


Dated: June 23, 2020




                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer