Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wiseman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17-2060V. (2020)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20200214b69 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2020
Summary: (not to be published) DECISION ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Chief Special Master . On December 29, 2017, Sylvia D. Wiseman ("Petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered adhesive capsulitis and a rotator cuff tear as a consequence of the influenza ("flu") vaccine she received on January 13, 2015, and further alleges t
More

(not to be published)

DECISION ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS1

On December 29, 2017, Sylvia D. Wiseman ("Petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered adhesive capsulitis and a rotator cuff tear as a consequence of the influenza ("flu") vaccine she received on January 13, 2015, and further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of her injury for more than six months. (Petition at 1,13). On June 26, 2019, a decision was issued by then Chief Special Master Dorsey awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the parties' stipulation. (ECF No. 37).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney's fees and costs, dated December 3, 2019, (ECF No. 42), requesting a total award of $18,722.09 (representing $17,562.90 in fees and $1,159.19 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9, counsel for Petitioner represents Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (Id. at 2). Respondent reacted to the motion on December 17, 2019 indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney's fees and costs are met in this case and defers to the Court's discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF No. 43). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner's request. In my experience, the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs. § 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner's Motion for attorney's fees and costs. I award a total of $18,722.09 (representing $17,562.90 in fees and $1,159.19 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner's counsel. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer