Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ammerman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1721V. (2020)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20200214b99 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Chief Special Master . On November 6, 2018, Kristen Ammerman filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered on December 2, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Spec
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On November 6, 2018, Kristen Ammerman filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered on December 2, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 31, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for a SIRVA. On January 8, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating Petitioner should be awarded $107,351.45 comprised of $105,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,351.45 for unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $107,351.45 comprised of $105,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,351.45 for unreimbursable expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On November 6, 2018, Kristen Ammerman ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine injury compensation alleging that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as result of an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered on December 2, 2016. On December 27, 2019, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. On December 31, 2019, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation.

I. Items of Compensation

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $107,351.45, comprised of $105,000.00 for pain and suffering and $2,351.45 for unreimbursable expenses. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner be made through a lump sum payment of $107,351.45 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.1 Petitioner agrees.

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division GABRIELLE M. FIELDING Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/Heather L. Pearlman HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Phone: (202) 353-2699 Email: heather.pearlman2@usdoj.gov DATED: January 8, 2020

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Should petitioner die prior to the entry of judgment, respondent reserves the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future pain and suffering, and future lost wages.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer