Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Paul v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 19-0821V. (2020)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20200305b33 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jan. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2020
Summary: (not to be published.) DECISION ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Chief Special Master . Special Processing Unit (SPU); Attorney's Fees and Costs. On June 4, 2019, Julian Paul ("Petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine injury ("SIRVA") as a result of a meningococcal vaccine adminis
More

(not to be published.)

DECISION ON ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS1

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Attorney's Fees and Costs.

On June 4, 2019, Julian Paul ("Petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine injury ("SIRVA") as a result of a meningococcal vaccine administered in his left deltoid on January 24, 2017. (Petition at 1). On November 22, 2019, a decision was issued awarding compensation to Petitioner based on the parties' stipulation. (ECF No. 22).

Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney's fees and costs, dated December 18, 2019, (ECF No. 26), requesting a total award of $19,304.32 (representing $18,764.50 in fees and $539.82 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9 Petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that Petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. (ECF No. 17). Respondent reacted to the motion on December 30, 2019 indicating that he is satisfied that the statutory requirements for an award of attorney's fees and costs are met in this case and defers to the Court's discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF No. 27). Petitioner did not file a reply thereafter.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with Petitioner's requests and find a reduction in the amount of fees to be awarded appropriate for the reason listed below.

ANALYSIS

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs. § 15(e). Counsel must submit fee requests that include contemporaneous and specific billing records indicating the service performed, the number of hours expended on the service, and the name of the person performing the service. See Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313, 316-18 (2008). Counsel should not include in their fee requests hours that are "excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary." Saxton v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). It is "well within the special master's discretion to reduce the hours to a number that, in [her] experience and judgment, [is] reasonable for the work done." Id. at 1522. Furthermore, the special master may reduce a fee request sua sponte, apart from objections raised by respondent and without providing a petitioner notice and opportunity to respond. See Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 209 (2009). A special master need not engage in a line-by-line analysis of petitioner's fee application when reducing fees. Broekelschen v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 102 Fed. Cl. 719, 729 (2011).

The petitioner "bears the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and the expenses incurred." Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. at 482, 484 (1991). The Petitioner "should present adequate proof [of the attorney's fees and costs sought] at the time of the submission." Id. at 484 n.1. Petitioner's counsel "should make a good faith effort to exclude from a fee request hours that are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary, just as a lawyer in private practice ethically is obligated to exclude such hours from his fee submission." Hensley, 461 U.S., at 434.

A. Hourly Rates

Petitioner requests compensation for attorney Bobbie Flynt at the rate of $400 per hour for all time billed in this case during 2018 and 2019. (ECF No. 26 at 1). In the affidavit filed with the motion, Petitioner stating that Ms. Flynt has been a licensed attorney since 1996. (Id. at 1). Ms. Flynt has previously been awarded the rate of $385 per hour for time billed in 2019. See Taylor v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 18-0798, 2019 WL 5855903, (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. August 13, 2019). I agree with the previous Special Master's reasoning in Taylor and reduce Ms. Flynt's rates to $385 for time billed in 2019. This results in a reduction of $645.00.3

ATTORNEY COSTS

Petitioner requests $539.82 in overall costs. (ECF No. 26 at 2). This amount is comprised of obtaining medical records, postage and the Court's filing fee. I have reviewed all of the requested costs and find the overall amount to be reasonable and shall award it in full.

CONCLUSION

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs. § 15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner's Motion for attorney's fees and costs. I award a total of $18,659.32 (representing $18,119.50 in attorney's fees and $539.82 in costs) as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner's counsel. In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. This amount consists of $400-$385 = $15 × 43hrs = $645.00.
4. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer