KATHERINE E. OLER, Special Master.
On August 27, 2018, Ursula Hallvik ("Petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,
On August 30, 2019, Respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report contesting Petitioner's right to damages and requesting the dismissal of the claim. ECF No. 24. On November 22, 2019, Petitioner filed a status report expressing her intent to file an expert report in 60 days. On January 21, 2020, Petitioner filed a status report informing the Court that she was unable to find an expert. ECF No. 28.
Petitioner filed a motion to dismiss her claim on January 24, 2020, indicating that "[a]n investigation of the facts and science by a number of experts in peripheral neuropathy has demonstrated to petitioner that she will be unable to prove that she is entitled to compensation in the Vaccine Program." Pet'r's Mot., ECF No. 30 at 1.
To receive compensation under the Vaccine Program, a petitioner must prove either (1) that she suffered a "Table Injury" — i.e., an injury falling within the Vaccine Injury Table — corresponding to her vaccination, or (2) that she suffered an injury that was actually caused by a vaccine. See §§ 13(a)(1)(A) and 11(c)(1). Moreover, under the Vaccine Act, a petitioner may not receive a Vaccine Program award based solely on her claims alone. Rather, the petition must be supported by either medical records or by the opinion of a competent medical expert. § 13(a)(1). In this case, however, there is insufficient evidence in the record for Petitioner to meet her burden of proof. Petitioner's claim therefore cannot succeed and, in accordance with her motion, must be dismissed. § 11(c)(1)(A).
Petitioner's Motion for a Decision; Dismissal of Petition; Vaccine Act.