welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Case Laws
  3. United States Court of Federal Claims
  4. 2020
  5. Dautkhanova v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1430V. (2020)

Dautkhanova v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1430V. (2020)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20200310b30 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Chief Special Master . On September 19, 2018, Tatiana Dautkhanova and Ruslan Dautkhanov, on behalf of E.D., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioners allege that E.D. suffered a vasovagal syncope and dental fractures caused by an influenza ("flu") vaccination administered on December 9, 2017. Petition at 1-2. The ca
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On September 19, 2018, Tatiana Dautkhanova and Ruslan Dautkhanov, on behalf of E.D., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioners allege that E.D. suffered a vasovagal syncope and dental fractures caused by an influenza ("flu") vaccination administered on December 9, 2017. Petition at 1-2. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 10, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioners entitled to compensation for a vasovagal syncope and dental fractures. On January 28, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating Petitioners should be awarded $91,000.00 (which amount represents $21,000.00 for future medical expenses, reduced to net present value) as court-appointed guardian(s)/conservator(s) of E.D., for the benefit of E.D., and $1,990.16 for past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioners agree with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioners are entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award:

A. A lump sum payment of $91,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioners as court-appointed guardian(s)/ conservator(s) of E.D., for the benefit of E.D. No payments shall be made until petitioners provide respondent with documentation establishing that they have been appointed as the guardian(s)/conservator(s) of E.D.'s estate. If petitioners are not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of E.D., any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of E.D. upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary. B. A lump sum payment of $1,990.16, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioners.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Vasovagal Syncope.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

TATIANA DAUTKHANOVA and RUSLAN DAUTKHANOV, on behalf of E.D., a minor child, Petitioners, No. 18-1430V v. Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Compensation for Vaccine-Related Items:

On April 8, 2019, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. On April 10, 2019, the Court issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for a Table injury of vasovagal syncope as a result of a flu vaccination. Respondent proffers that, based on the evidence of record, petitioners should be awarded a lump sum of $91,000.00 to petitioners as legal representatives of E.D. (which amount represents $21,000.00 in for future medical expenses1 and $70,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering); and $1,990.16 for past unreimbursable expenses.2

These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioners would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioners agree.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioners should be made through two lump sum payments as described below, and request that the Chief Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following:3

A. A lump sum payment of $91,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioners as court-appointed guardian(s)/ conservator(s) of E.D., for the benefit of E.D. No payments shall be made until petitioners provide respondent with documentation establishing that they have been appointed as the guardian(s)/conservator(s) of E.D.'s estate. If petitioners are not authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of E.D., any such payment shall be made to the party or parties appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of E.D. upon submission of written documentation of such appointment to the Secretary. B. A lump sum payment of $1,990.16, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioners. Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /S/ ALEXIS B. BABCOCK ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-7678 Dated: January 28, 2020

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioners has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. This amount, for E.D.'s future dental work, has been reduced to net present value.
2. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(f)(4)(A).
3. Should E.D. die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, and future pain and suffering.
Source:  Leagle
Lawyers who claimed
No Lawyers
Citations
18-1430V.
Counsels
  • Danielle Anne Strait
  • Alexis B. Babcock
Similar Cases

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer