Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Blaylock v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-1534V. (2020)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20200310b33 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 BRIAN H. CORCORAN , Chief Special Master . On October 4, 2018, Jamie Blaylock filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered injuries, including shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), resulting from the adverse effects of an influenza vaccination received on October 4, 2016. Petition at 1. The c
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On October 4, 2018, Jamie Blaylock filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered injuries, including shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA), resulting from the adverse effects of an influenza vaccination received on October 4, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 25, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On February 5, 2020, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating Petitioner should be awarded $91,906.04. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $91,906.04 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

JAMIE BLAYLOCK, Petitioner, v. No. 18-1534V Chief Special Master Corcoran (SPU) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Compensation for Vaccine Injury-Related Items

On October 24, 2019, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report conceding that petitioner is entitled to vaccine compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration ("SIRVA") injury suffered following receipt of an influenza vaccination on October 4, 2016. On October 25, 2019, a Ruling on Entitlement, adopting respondent's recommendation, was issued.

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner1 should be awarded $91,906.04. This is comprised of pain and suffering ($90,000) and past unreimbursed out-of-pocket medical expenses ($1,906.04), and represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).2 Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through:

a lump sum of $91,906.04 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

Petitioner agrees.

Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division s/ JAMES V. LOPEZ James V. Lopez Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-3655 Fax: (202) 616-4310 Email: james.lopez@usdoj.gov Dated: February 5, 2020

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Petitioner is a competent adult, therefore evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
2. Should Petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer