R. KIMBALL MOSIER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the Court on December 4, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. (the "
Based upon the evidence received at the Confirmation Hearing, the Debtor's Memorandum of Law in Support of Plan of Liquidation under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 537] other papers filed concerning the Plan [e.g., Docket Nos. 523, 525, 526, 528, 531, 532, 535, 536, 539 and 540], the statements of counsel and other matters of record, having inquired into the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
This Court has jurisdiction over the Bankruptcy Case
This Court takes judicial notice of the docket of the Bankruptcy Case maintained by the Bankruptcy Court, including, without limitation, all pleadings, papers and other documents filed, all orders entered, and the transcripts of, and all minute entries, all transcripts of hearings, and all of the evidence received and arguments made at the hearings held before the Court during the pendency of the Bankruptcy Case.
All due, adequate, and sufficient notices of the Plan, the Confirmation Hearing, and the deadlines for voting on and filing objections to the Plan, were given to all known holders of Claims and Interests in accordance with the Bankruptcy Rules. The Disclosure Statement, Plan, and relevant ballots were transmitted and served in substantial compliance with the Bankruptcy Rules upon Creditors and holders of Equity Interests entitled to vote on the Plan, and such transmittal and service were adequate and sufficient. No other or further notice of the Plan or Confirmation Hearing is or shall be required.
The solicitation of votes for acceptance or rejection of the Plan complied with §§ 1125 and 1126,
All procedures used to distribute the solicitation materials to the applicable holders of Claims and Equity Interests and to tabulate the ballots were fair and conducted in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, the local rules of the Bankruptcy Court, and all other rules, laws, and regulations.
The Plan establishes three Classes of Claims and one Class of Interests. Class 1 accepted the Plan. Classes 2, 3 and 4 were impaired and were not entitled to vote on the Plan. They are deemed to have rejected the Plan; nevertheless, the Debtor received one vote to accept the Plan from a member of Class 2. No creditors in Classes 2, 3 and 4 objected to confirmation of the Plan. There were no objections to the Plan.
The Plan, as supplemented and modified by the Confirmation Order, complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, thereby satisfying § 1129(a)(1).
The Claims and Interests placed in each Class are substantially similar to other Claims in each such Class. The Plan properly classifies Claims. In addition to Administrative Expense Claims and Priority Tax Claims, which are not classified under the Plan, the Plan designates various separate Classes of Claims and Interests based on differences in their legal nature or priority. Further, valid business, factual and legal reasons exist for separately classifying the various Classes of Claims and Interests under the Plan. Finally, the Classes do not unfairly discriminate between holders of Claims and/or the Holders of Interests. Thus, the Plan satisfies §§ 1122 and 1123(a)(1).
Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4 are designated as impaired Classes under the Plan. No Classes are unimpaired. Thus, § 1123(a)(2) is satisfied.
Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4 are designated as impaired under the Plan. Article IV of the Plan specifies the treatment of the impaired Classes of Claims and Interests, thereby satisfying § 1123(a)(3).
The Plan provides for the same treatment for each Claim or Interest in each respective Class unless the holder of a particular Claim or Interest has agreed to less favorable treatment with respect to such Claim or Interest, thereby satisfying § 1123(a)(4).
The Plan provides adequate and proper means for implementation of the Plan, thereby satisfying § 1123(a)(5). Among other things, Articles VI and VIII provides for (a) the revesting of the assets of the Estate in the Reorganized Debtor; (b) the continuation of bankruptcy case administration; (c) cash distributions to the holders of allowed Class 1 Claims; (d) appointment of Plan Administrator; and (e) the winding down of the affairs of the Debtor.
The identity and affiliations of Michael Rich, who will serve as the Plan Administrator, is properly disclosed in the Disclosure Statement and the Plan. Thus, § 1123(a)(7) is satisfied.
The Plan's provisions are appropriate and consistent with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, including provisions respecting (a) the rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases, (b) provisions governing distributions on account of Allowed Claims, particularly as to the timing and calculation of amounts to be distributed, (c) establishing procedures for resolving Disputed Claims and making distributions on account of such Disputed Claims once resolved, and (d) provisions regarding the retention by this Court over certain matters after the Effective Date. As such, the requirements of § 1123(b) are satisfied.
The Plan is dated and identifies the
Debtor as the proponent, thereby satisfying Bankruptcy Rule 3016(a).
The Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Likewise, the Debtor has complied with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. Thus, §§ 1129(a)(1) and (a)(2) are satisfied.
The Plan is proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law and, therefore, complies with the requirements of § 1129(a)(3). In determining that the Plan has been proposed in good faith, the Court has examined the totality of the circumstances surrounding the filing of the Bankruptcy Case and the formulation of the Plan.
Any payment made or to be made under the Plan for services or for costs and expenses in or in connection with the Bankruptcy Case prior to the Effective Date, including all fees and expenses incurred by Professionals, has been approved by, or is subject to the approval of, the Court as reasonable, thereby satisfying § 1129(a)(4).
The Plan and the Disclosure Statement state that Michael Rich will serve as the Plan Administrator of the Reorganized Debtor. His service is consistent with the interests of the holders of Claims and with public policy. Therefore, the requirements of § 1129(a)(5) are satisfied.
The Plan satisfies § 1129(a)(6) because the Confirmed Plan does not provide for any change in rates over which a governmental regulatory commission has jurisdiction.
The Plan satisfies § 1129(a)(7) with respect to all Classes of Claims and Interests. All Classes have either accepted the Plan, or will receive property of a value, as of the Effective Date, that is not less than the amount that such holder would so receive or retain if the debtor were liquidated under chapter 7 on the Effective Date. As such, § 1129(a)(7)(A) is satisfied.
Class 1 accepted the Plan. Classes 2, 3 and 4 were not entitled to vote on the Plan and are deemed to reject the Plan. As described in Section "W" below, the Plan satisfies the "cram down" requirements as to these Classes.
The Plan satisfies the requirements of § 1129(a)(9). Except to the extent the holder of a particular Claim agrees to a different treatment, the Plan specifies that Administrative Expense Claims (including professional compensation) and Priority Tax Claims shall be paid as mandated by § 1129(a)(9).
As set forth in the Ballot Tabulation Report [Docket No. 536], Class 1, which is impaired and is not an insider, was entitled to vote on the Plan and has accepted the Plan. Therefore, the Debtor has satisfied this requirements of § 1129(a)(10).
The Plan is feasible and complies with § 1129(a)(11) because confirmation is not likely to be followed by a liquidation or the need for further financial reorganization of the Debtor. The Court is satisfied that the Plan offers a reasonable prospect of success and is workable. As such, the requirements of section 1129(a)(11) are satisfied.
All fees payable under 28 U.S.C. § 1930 have been paid, or will be paid on or before the Effective Date, pursuant to Section 2.2(b) of the Plan, thereby satisfying § 1129(a)(12).
The Plan complies with § 1129(a)(13) because the Debtor is not obligated to pay any retiree benefits subject to § 1114.
The Debtor does not have any domestic support obligations. Therefore, § 1129(a)(14) is not applicable.
The Debtor is not an individual. As such § 1129(a)(15) is not applicable.
The Plan complies with § 1129(a)(16) because any transfers of assets to be made under the Plan will be made in accordance with applicable nonbankruptcy law that governs the transfer of property by a corporation or trust that is not a moneyed, business, or commercial corporation or trust.
Classes 2, 3 and 4 were not entitled to vote on the Plan and are deemed to have rejected the Plan. There is no unfair discrimination between the Classes of Claims because there is a reasonable basis for the different treatment of each Class of Claims. The Plan is fair and equitable to unsecured Claims (Classes 2 and 3) because the Plan satisfies the "Absolute Priority Rule." The Plan is fair and equitable to Equity Interests because the Plan gives the holders of Equity Interests the value of their interests, which is zero, and because no holder or other person having an interest "junior" to Classes 2 or 3 will receive or retain any property under the Plan. Accordingly, the Plan complies with the requirements of § 1129(b).
No other chapter 11 plan is pending before the Court in this Bankruptcy Case and no other plan has been, or will be, confirmed in this Case. As such, the requirements of § 1129(c) are satisfied.
The principal purpose of the Plan is not the avoidance of taxes or the avoidance of the application of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. § 77e). Therefore, the Plan satisfies the requirements of § 1129(d).
AA. In summary, the Confirmed Plan complies with, and the Debtor has satisfied, all applicable confirmation requirements, and the Plan will be confirmed by entry of the separate Confirmation Order.