24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC. v. BROCKETT, 2:11-MC-1134 TS. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20120622e62
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON 24 HOUR FITNESS'S PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION TED STEWART, District Judge. Based on the reasoning in 24 Hour Fitness USA v. Omlin, 2:11-mc-01126-TS, it is ORDERED that 24 Hour Fitness's Petition to Compel Arbitration is stayed pending the ruling on the Special Master's recommendation in the Northern District of California. After such a ruling 24 Hour Fitness shall produce a report to the Court within 10 days summarizing how the ruling affects 24 Hour Fitn
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON 24 HOUR FITNESS'S PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION TED STEWART, District Judge. Based on the reasoning in 24 Hour Fitness USA v. Omlin, 2:11-mc-01126-TS, it is ORDERED that 24 Hour Fitness's Petition to Compel Arbitration is stayed pending the ruling on the Special Master's recommendation in the Northern District of California. After such a ruling 24 Hour Fitness shall produce a report to the Court within 10 days summarizing how the ruling affects 24 Hour Fitne..
More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON 24 HOUR FITNESS'S PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
TED STEWART, District Judge.
Based on the reasoning in 24 Hour Fitness USA v. Omlin, 2:11-mc-01126-TS, it is
ORDERED that 24 Hour Fitness's Petition to Compel Arbitration is stayed pending the ruling on the Special Master's recommendation in the Northern District of California. After such a ruling 24 Hour Fitness shall produce a report to the Court within 10 days summarizing how the ruling affects 24 Hour Fitness's Petition to Compel Arbitration.
Source: Leagle
