CRAWFORD v. SANDY CITY CORPORATION, 2:11-CV-351 TS. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20120719a83
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT SCOPE OF PLAINTIFF'S REBUTTAL EXPERT TESTIMONY TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion in Limine to Limit Scope of Plaintiff's Rebuttal Expert Testimony. Defendants argue that, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Plaintiff's rebuttal expert witness Joseph Sanchez should be required to limit his testimony to the opinions of Defendants' expert that Defendants actually offer into evidence at tr
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT SCOPE OF PLAINTIFF'S REBUTTAL EXPERT TESTIMONY TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion in Limine to Limit Scope of Plaintiff's Rebuttal Expert Testimony. Defendants argue that, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Plaintiff's rebuttal expert witness Joseph Sanchez should be required to limit his testimony to the opinions of Defendants' expert that Defendants actually offer into evidence at tri..
More
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO LIMIT SCOPE OF PLAINTIFF'S REBUTTAL EXPERT TESTIMONY
TED STEWART, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion in Limine to Limit Scope of Plaintiff's Rebuttal Expert Testimony. Defendants argue that, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Plaintiff's rebuttal expert witness Joseph Sanchez should be required to limit his testimony to the opinions of Defendants' expert that Defendants actually offer into evidence at trial. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants' Motion and it is consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
It is therefore
ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine to Limit Scope of Plaintiff's Rebuttal Expert Testimony (Docket No. 40) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
