DALE A. KIMBALL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Assignee Republic Bank, Inc.'s ("Republic Bank") Motion for Substitution of Parties and Amendment of Final Judgment. (Docket No. [18]). Republic Bank moves pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c) which allows for substitution of parties when a transfer of interest occurs. This Rule states:
Based upon the filings of Republic Bank in support of its motion, the Court finds that the requirements of service under Rule 25(a)(3) have been met. Republic Bank filed the instant motion on April 23, 2014, and as of the date of this decision there has been no opposition filed. Local Rule 7-1(d) provides that the Court may grant a motion if there is no opposition filed. See DUCivR 7-1(d) (2011). Thus, failure to file any opposition is another independent basis for the Court to grant Republic Bank's motion.
Effective April 9, 2014, Tetra Financial Group, LLC ("Tetra") assigned to Republic Bank all of its rights and interests in the following Default Judgment (Docket No. [18]) entered against the Defendants listed below:
Default Judgment (Docket No. [18]) entered against the Defendants on September 7, 2010. The Defendants are:
Therefore, in light of the assignment of rights in this suit from original Plaintiff Tetra to Republic Bank, the Court finds Republic Bank's request for substitution of parties under Rule 25 is well taken.
Accordingly, for those reasons fully set forth in Republic Bank's memorandum in support of its motion, finding good cause shown, and pursuant to Rule 25(c), the Court GRANTS Republic Bank's Motion for Substitution of Parties and Amendment of Final Judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to make the necessary changes to the Final Judgment and all future pleadings are to reflect the substitutions.