Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MARIS, 2:12CV1074 DAK. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Utah Number: infdco20140819c80 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST KEITH L. MARIS, DONNA L. MARIS, MARK JACOBS, AND ANDERSON'S EXCAVATION, INC. DALE A. KIMBALL, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motions for Clerk's Entry of Default Against Keith L. Maris, Donna L. Maris, Mark Jacobs, and Anderson's Excavation, Inc. and on Defendant Keith Maris' "Motion to Deny Plaintiff's Request to Have the Clerk's Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendant Keith L. Maris and Donna L. Maris (the "Motion t
More

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST KEITH L. MARIS, DONNA L. MARIS, MARK JACOBS, AND ANDERSON'S EXCAVATION, INC.

DALE A. KIMBALL, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motions for Clerk's Entry of Default Against Keith L. Maris, Donna L. Maris, Mark Jacobs, and Anderson's Excavation, Inc. and on Defendant Keith Maris' "Motion to Deny Plaintiff's Request to Have the Clerk's Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendant Keith L. Maris and Donna L. Maris (the "Motion to Deny"). In his motion, Mr. Maris claims that the court should deny the requests for default pursuant to Docket No. 38, "Order Dismissing Case Action Without Prejustice [sic]." As readily identified in the docket entry, however, the Order to which Mr. Maris refers pertains to an entirely different case, and it was mistakenly entered in this case.1 The Order of Dismissal has nothing to do with the instant case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Keith Maris' Motion to Deny [Docket No. 45] is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motions for Clerk's Entry of Default [Docket Nos. 39, 40, 41, & 42] are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter default against Keith L. Maris, Donna L. Maris, Mark Jacobs, and Anderson's Excavation, Inc.

FootNotes


1. The Docket Entry for Docket No. 38 reads: "***PLEASE DISREGARD — ENTRY ERROR***". The mistake was noted in the docket text on the same day the Order was mistakenly entered: "modified on 4/18/2014 by adding error message." Therefore, when Mr. Maris filed his Motion to Deny on May 29, 2014, the error had been corrected for well over a month.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer